Judge David M. Lawson

Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse

231 W. Lafayette Blvd., Room 775

Detroit, MI 48226

Courtroom: Room 767

Chambers Telephone: (313) 234-2660

Chambers Fax: (313) 234-2669

Case Manager: Susan Pinkowski - (313) 234-2662 - susan_pinkowski@mied.uscourts.gov

Court Reporter: Rene Twedt - (313) 234-2613

Print Guideline

Chambers staff is happy to answer questions about chambers procedures. HOWEVER, please consult the Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures, the Local Rules, the case docket (if applicable) and the information on this website before contacting Chambers with a question.

The Judge prefers that papers submitted electronically to chambers be in the current version of Word.

Local Rules are enforced - please pay particular attention to L.R.7.1, and Electronic Filing Rules 5 and 9(d).

Stipulations should be e-filed through the CM/ECF system. However, proposed Orders regarding those Stipulations should be directed to Chambers via the link located under the Utilities section in CM/ECF. Please consult Rule 12 of the ECF Policies and Procedures for additional information regarding Proposed Orders. Stipulations combined with orders are discouraged.

The short statements (pleading format, double spaced) required by the Notice of the Case Management and Scheduling Conference should be e-mailed to Chambers at susan_pinkowski@mied.uscourts.gov. They are not to be e-filed.

The Court encourages the use of modern technology to display exhibits and demonstrative aides during trial. However, prior arrangements must be made with Chambers staff. Requests for interpreters and accommodations for witnesses with disabilities should be made with Chambers at least one week before needed.

If a case is settled, the parties must notify Chambers in writing via email or telefax by the next business day.

If you do not have the current version of Adobe, please download it.

Print Guideline

All removed cases are reviewed. A standing order for removal is issued in many cases, to which the removing party must respond within  seven (7) days. If jurisdiction is questionable, an order to show cause will be issued. Motions to remand must be filed within 30 days of removal.

Print Guideline

Civil Cases

The Court conducts an initial case management and scheduling conference, which must be attended in person by counsel, preferably lead counsel. A notice generally will be sent within two to four weeks after a responsive pleading is filed. The notice informs the parties to submit to chambers (but not e-file) a short statement describing the case and addressing matters that will be discussed at the conference, or if they can agree, docket a joint Rule 26(f) statement which should include all the items described in the conference notice..

At the initial case management and scheduling conference the parties are expected to be prepared to summarize the case and the issues and to discuss subject matter jurisdiction. Parties also must discuss alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options with their clients. A case management and scheduling order is completed at the initial case management and scheduling conference, with input from the parties.

Subsequent status conferences are also scheduled periodically by the Court. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) will be addressed, and counsel should discuss ADR options with clients before the status conference. Counsel may request additional status conferences to be conducted in person or by telephone by contacting the case manager.

A final pretrial conference and settlement conference is scheduled approximately two weeks before the trial date. The proposed Joint Final Pretrial Order must be submitted to Chambers, not e-filed, at least one week before the scheduled final pretrial conference date. Please note that the section of the Case Management and Scheduling Order prescribing the contents of the Joint Final Pretrial Order may supercede portions of E.D. Mich L.R.16.2 in some instances. The Case Management and Scheduling Order controls.

Criminal Cases

The Court will issue a scheduling order. Requests to change or enlarge calendar dates must be made by motion. The Court usually addresses those requests on the record. A final pretrial conference is conducted by the Court, as noted in the section on Pretrials.

Print Guideline

Judge Lawson accepts no ex parte communications. Counsel may contact the Case Manager or the judge's Judicial Assistant with respect to procedural and scheduling matters only. Questions about pending cases should be directed to the Case Manager. Contact by counsel or parties with the law clerks is discouraged.

Print Guideline

Bail

Arraignments and initial bail and detention determinations generally are conducted by the magistrate judge. Review of those decisions is by written motion, which the Court will address promptly. Counsel must furnish a copy of the motion to review a detention order to the assigned pretrial services officer.

Pleas

There is a strong preference that plea agreements be in writing. Judge Lawson does not object to plea agreements that involve sentencing recommendations under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(B) or (C). In the Criminal Trial Notice and Scheduling Order, the Court will establish a plea cut-off deadline and final pretrial date approximately two weeks before trial beyond which no plea agreements will be accepted.

Discovery Procedures

Unless there is a well-founded concern for the safety of the witness, the parties are strongly encouraged to provide Jencks and reciprocal Jencks material no later than the day before the final pretrial conference and plea cut-off date, or sooner if the parties agree.

Presence of the Defendant

The defendant must be present at all court hearings unless prior permission to be absent is obtained from the Court. If a writ is required, it must be submitted four weeks before the court date.

Sentencing Practices

Sentencing recommendations of the probation officer are not divulged. Counsel must raise any objections to presentence investigative reports, guideline computations, and other such matters in writing before sentencing in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(b)(6). The procedure for filing objections and a sentencing memorandum is set forth in the Court's Standing Order Prescribing Sentencing Procedures. If a party intends to present witnesses at a sentencing hearing, the party must contact the case manager one week in advance to advise.

Print Guideline

The parties are encouraged to conduct their Rule 26(f) discovery conference before the case management and scheduling conference established by the Court. The disclosure requirements of Rule 26(a)(1) generally will be required by the Court 14 days after the case management and scheduling conference. Dates for disclosure of expert information contemplated by Rule 26(a)(2) generally will be established at the case management and scheduling conference. The parties are encouraged to summarize discovery disputes and email a joint letter to the Court, schedule a telephone conference, and discuss the issue before filing discovery motions. Discovery motions generally are referred to the magistrate judge for disposition. Once a motion has been referred, all communication regarding that motion should be directed to the magistrate judge's chambers.

Print Guideline

When applying for an internship, please submit your cover letter, resume, transcript, and writing sample via U.S. mail or email to chambers at Susan_Pinkowski@mied.uscourts.gov.

Applications should be submitted to chambers at least two months before the anticipated start date.

Print Guideline

Discovery motions may be referred to the magistrate judge. Once a motion has been referred, all communication regarding that motion should be directed to the magistrate judge's chambers.

The Court strictly enforces the requirements of Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 5.1 and Local Rule 7.1 and the Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures for all motions. Failure to follow these rules likely will result in a denial of the motion and may lead to sanctions.

The Court requires strict compliance with LR 7.1(a), which requires moving parties to seek concurrence before filing a motion. The Court requires that a good-faith effort be made to obtain concurrence, which normally involves actual voice contact with opposing counsel. If no actual conversation occurs, the moving party must show that reasonable efforts were undertaken to conduct a conference and specifically describe those efforts in the motion papers. The outcome of the conference must be stated. All of this must be documented specifically in the motion papers. Failure to comply with LR 7.1 (a) usually results in dismissal of the motion.

Motions must be clear and succinct without extensive factual development. All briefs must comply with Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 5.1 and Local Rule 7.1, and must contain citation of appropriate authorities within the text of the brief (not in footnotes), and citations must conform to the latest edition of The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation published by the Harvard Law Review. In addition, briefs must contain a concise statement of facts supported by references to the record. References to the record must conform to Rule 6 of the Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures. Footnotes are discouraged, but if they are utilized they must be printed in the same font size as the text, which may be no smaller than 10-1/2 characters per inch (non-proportional) or 14 point (proportional).

Answers to motions and supporting briefs must be filed according to the schedule set forth in Local Rule 7.1(d). Note that Rule R5(e) of the Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures prohibits combining an answer to a motion with a counter-motion in the same filing. The Court normally does not issue a briefing schedule for motions. The Court enforces the response and reply due dates as set forth in LR 7.1(d) and Fed. R. Civ. P.6, even when the motion hearing is set far in advance. Attorneys who do not respond to motions in a timely fashion are not permitted to argue before the Court during oral argument, if oral argument is scheduled.

Counsel are discouraged from employing elaborate boilerplate recitations of the applicable motion standards and lengthy string citations in support of well-established legal principles. Instead, counsel should focus their analysis on a few well-chosen cases, preferably recent, published, and from controlling courts. When citing unpublished sources, Westlaw references are preferred.

Facts stated in the statement of facts must be supported with citations of either the pleadings, interrogatories, admissions, depositions, affidavits, or documentary exhibits. Exhibits not previously filed should be included with an appendix. The appendix must contain an index. As to cited deposition testimony, counsel are also encouraged to supply the Court with a transcript of cited page(s) together with sufficient accompanying pages to provide context. All citations must have page references. Other documents referred to in the briefs should be included in the appendix. Counsel may highlight their submissions.

When filing a paper in a criminal case through CM/ECF, select ONLY your individual client. Do NOT select all defendants.

Courtesy copies of motions and briefs for motions listed in LR 7.1 (e)(2)(A) must be provided to Chambers. Parties may submit courtesy copies of other motions, exhibits, responses and replies to Chambers. All papers must be firmly bound along the left margin (by binding or in a 3-ring binder) and any exhibits must be properly tabbed.

If a hearing is scheduled, the Court's Case Manager will docket a notice of the hearing date.

The Court endeavors to decide pending motions promptly, ordinarily within six weeks after a hearing, or within three weeks after the time for a response has passed without a response being filed. Complex motions or those raising novel issues may require additional time to conclude. If a motion has been pending in chambers without resolution for an apparently inordinate time, counsel are asked to notify the Court's Case Manager by telephone or in writing (jointly if possible) as to the status of the motion. Such notification is a service that is appreciated by the Court and is not viewed by the Court as inappropriate or impertinent.

If a party intends to call witnesses at a motion hearing, the party must notify Chambers at least two weeks in advance of the hearing date and inform the Case Manager of the anticipated length of time needed for the testimony.

Local Rule 5.3 sets forth in detail the procedure that must be followed before any item may be filed on the docket under seal.

Before docketing any paper under seal, whether it is a motion, an exhibit, or any other item, you must file a motion requesting the Court's permission to file the item under seal. Also, as with any motion, before filing a motion to seal you must seek concurrence from counsel for all other parties, unless the applicable rules of court allow you to seek relief ex parte. Local Rules 5.3 and 7.1 apply in the usual manner to all motions seeking leave for filing items under seal.

If you are seeking to file papers such as certain exhibits with medical or other personal information under seal, but the motion for leave to file under seal does not itself disclose any information that needs to be maintained under seal, then you may e-file the motion for leave (NOT under seal), with the items that you want to have sealed as separately docketed exhibits (under seal), according to the procedure outlined in Local Rule 5.3. Again, keep in mind that you also must comply in the usual way with all other applicable rules of court, such as Local Rule 7.1.

If the motion to seal itself contains information that you believe should be sealed, or if you need to file information under seal that by its nature should not be revealed to opposing counsel (e.g., motions to authorize fees or services in a criminal matter), then you should email the case manager (not docket) the motion or other papers that you want filed under seal, and a motion for leave to file all of the items under seal, each as separate files in Microsoft Word format, using the Utilities function of CM-ECF, which goes directly to the case manager. In this case you SHOULD NOT e-file any of the items in any form, either sealed or unsealed, before sending them via Utilities. The items will be docketed appropriately by the case manager.

In either case, when a motion to seal is docketed or received via Utilities, then the Court will consider whether it should be granted and issue an appropriate order. If you believe that the order granting the motion also should be sealed, then your motion to seal should so state.

Note that in the usual case the Court will not grant requests to seal an entire motion and brief or all associated exhibits where only limited portions of certain exhibits contain sensitive information. The Court also will not grant “sealed motions to seal” where the motion for leave to file under seal does not itself disclose sensitive information or information that should not be divulged to other parties or their counsel. Orders granting motions to seal also typically will not be filed under seal unless docketing the order on the public docket would defeat the purpose of the confidential filing.

Print Guideline

Civil Cases

Final pretrial conferences are generally conducted on the date and time set out in the Case Management and Scheduling Order. The form of a Joint Final Pretrial Order is explicitly set forth in the Court's Case Management and Scheduling Order. Please review the Case Management and Scheduling Order before attempting to draft the proposed Joint Final Pretrial Order. Status conferences are scheduled at various times during the pretrial period, and the Court encourages counsel to discuss with each other and their clients all forms of ADR options. The Court especially encourages the use of facilitative mediation. You may contact chambers for a list of suggested facilitators.

Motions in limine are generally to be filed no later than five weeks before the final pretrial conference so that responses can be filed in accordance with E.D. Mich. LR 7.1 and the motions will be ready for decision at the time of the final pretrial conference. Filing deadlines generally are stated in the Case Management and Scheduling Order. Alternately, decisions on motions in limine may be deferred until trial.

Deadlines for filing proposed voir dire questions and jury instructions are set forth in the Case Management and Scheduling Order. Deadlines for submission of proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in bench trials are set forth in the Case Management and Scheduling Order, but generally must be submitted at least one week before trial.

Criminal Cases

The final pretrial conference is conducted on the record. Counsel of record must attend; stand-ins are not allowed except in extraordinary circumstances, and then only with prior permission of the Court, and with the consent of the client. Deadlines are established at that point for filing jury instructions and proposed voir dire questions. Discussion on the manner of jury selection is held on the record. Defendants must be present for the final pretrial conference. The Court establishes a plea cut-off date, set forth in the Criminal Trial Notice and Scheduling Order, which is enforced. The parties may comply with the plea cut-off date by signing and submitting a Rule 11 agreement on or before the deadline; it is not necessary that a guilty plea be made on the record before the plea cut-off date.

Special Cases

Social Security appeals and pro se prisoner Civil Rights cases are generally referred to the magistrate judge for case management.

General Rule

In all cases, requests for special arrangements such as audio-visual equipment, demonstrative aids, interpreters, and accommodations for witnesses with disabilities, should be made at or before the final pretrial conference. Exhibits must be pre-marked and an exhibit list must be furnished to the Court on a form which is established by the Court. Request for authorization to bring electronic equipment (computers, etc.) into the courtroom should be made at or before the final pretrial conference.

Print Guideline

Stipulations should be docketed and a proposed order sent through the Utilities function of CM-ECF.

If either party is pro se, and that party is not an efiler, then the pro se's original wet signature must be on the stipulation.

Print Guideline

The Court encourages parties to propose agreed protective orders. Such orders may be requested by docketing a stipulation outlining the proposed terms and submitting a proposed order through the utilities function of CM/ECF. The Court then will review the terms proposed and enter an appropriate order. If either party is pro se, and that party is not an efiler, then the pro se's original wet signature must be on the stipulation. However, stipulations for protective orders may not contain language that authorizes in advance the filing of documents under seal. Filings under seal are governed by Local Rule 5.3, and the Court requires those procedures to be followed. Therefore, proposed stipulations for protective orders MUST contain the following language:

  1. Filing Under Seal

    This order does not authorize the filing of any documents under seal. Documents may be sealed only if authorized by statute, rule, or order of the Court. A party seeking to have filed under seal any paper or other matter in this case must file and serve a motion that sets forth: (a) the authority for sealing; (b) an identification and description of each item proposed for sealing; (c) the reason that sealing each item is necessary; (d) the reason that a means other than sealing is not available or unsatisfactory to preserve the interest advanced by the movant in support of the seal; and (e) a memorandum of legal authority supporting the seal. See E.D. Mich. LR 5.3; Shane Group, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 825 F.3d 299 (6th Cir. 2016). With the exception of limited purpose filings allowed by Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 5.3(b)(3)(A)(vi), no party shall file or otherwise tender to the Clerk any item proposed for sealing unless the Court has granted the motion required by this section. Whenever a motion to seal is filed, the movant shall submit a brief that states the particular reason the seal is required. If a motion to seal is granted, then the documents to be sealed may be separately electronically filed under seal.

  2. Notice to Designating Party

    Any party, other than the Designating Party, that anticipates filing any material that has been designated as Confidential Information must provide reasonable notice to the Designating Party of the proposed filing, so that the Designating Party will have ample time, if it so desires, to file a motion for leave to file the material in question under seal. The parties then shall meet and confer in connection with any anticipated motion for an order authorizing the filing of Confidential Information under seal, in a good faith attempt to reach an agreement regarding whether the Confidential Information should be filed under seal. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(a). If an agreement is reached, then the parties may file a joint motion for leave to file under seal, in conformance with paragraph A and Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 5.3. If an agreement is not reached, then the Designating Party may file a motion in compliance with paragraph A and Local Rule 5.3. If the motion is denied, then the party separately may file the material, but not under seal.

Print Guideline

If you would like daily copy or real-time services at trial, you must seek permission from the Court before or during your Final Pretrial Conference. Once permission is obtained, you should contact Judge Lawson's court reporter immediately at rene_twedt@mied.uscourts.gov or 313-234-2660, to make payment arrangements.

To order transcripts, review delivery options and rates, access forms, etc., click here

Print Guideline

Trials are conducted on Monday through Friday. Jury trials generally will begin on Tuesday. Counsel are expected to be present in court in advance of the start time on trial days. Subject to the Court's availability, after the first trial day trials normally commence at 8:00 a.m. and continue through approximately 2:00 p.m., with two 15- minute breaks. Occasionally, trial days may also consist of 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. and 1:45 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. sessions. The Court establishes the schedule for trials at the commencement of each trial week.

Side bar conferences may be conducted during trial, but counsel are encouraged to keep them to a minimum. An exhibit book should be delivered to the Court one day before the commencement of trial. Normal and typical customs relating to courtroom decorum apply. For example, counsel should stand when addressing the Court; witness interrogation should be conducted from the lectern; counsel should seek permission from the Court to approach a witness or the bench; witnesses and parties should be addressed by their surname and an appropriate honorific. Chewing gum is prohibited.

Jury Trials

  1. Civil Cases

    The parties are required to exchange proposed jury instructions before the final pretrial conference, and the attorneys must submit a stipulated set of instructions and proposed voir dire questions at least one week before the commencement of the trial. Boilerplate instructions should not be included. Counsel may contact the case manager for the Court's standard instructions and voir dire questions. The Court gives the jury preliminary instructions before final argument, and after final argument charges the jury with respect to the manner of their deliberations. If the parties are unable to stipulate to all proposed instructions, disagreements will be discussed and resolved by the Court at the charge conference. The joint instructions must be submitted together with a computer disk or flash drive compatible with the current version of Word. All computer media submitted to Court must be certified as virus free.

    Civil Jury Instructions Boiler Plate

  2. Criminal Cases

    Proposed instructions and voir dire questions are to be submitted to Chambers (and not e-filed) in accordance with the deadline set at the final pretrial conference. Standard and boiler-plate instructions and voir dire should not be included. Counsel may contact the case manager for the Court's standard instructions and voir dire questions. Proposed jury instructions must be submitted together with a computer disk or flash drive compatible with the current version of Word. The Court encourages the parties to stipulate that alternate jurors will be identified at the conclusion of the trial at random (by lot). If such a stipulation is reached and made on the record, peremptory challenges normally limited to alternates may be exercised with respect to the entire jury panel. The Court gives the jury preliminary instructions before final argument, and after final argument charges the jury with respect to the manner of their deliberations.

    Criminal Jury Instructions Boiler Plate

  3. All Cases

    Documents and photographic exhibits must be published electronically. The parties must prepare two sets of exhibits in hard copy --- one for the Court and one for the jury to reference during deliberations. Attorneys are encouraged to engage a technologically-literate assistant to display the exhibits during trial. All counsel (and their assistants) must contact the Case Manager to arrange for a joint technology tutorial with the Court’s IT representative at lest one week before trial.

    In all cases, written copies of the jury instructions are given to the jurors before the jury charge. The Court conducts the initial voir dire , based upon the Court's standard voir dire questions (available in advance from the case manager) supplemented by proposed voir dire questions submitted by the parties. In most cases, the Court will permit parties to conduct voir dire personally by addressing follow-up questions to the jurors that are designed to be probative, and not didactic. Challenges for cause are made on the record in open court, but attorneys may request a side bar conference to interpose a cause challenge. Peremptory challenges are allowed in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 24 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 47 (and 28 U.S.C. § 1870), and are exercised by alternating between the parties.

    Trial briefs are optional in jury trials. If submitted, they must be exchanged no later than one week before the commencement of the trial. Trial briefs must include a synopsis of the facts, discussion of the controlling law, and discussion of any evidentiary issues likely to arise at trial.

    The Court will discuss time limits on opening statements with counsel before trial begins. Keep opening statements brief, for the benefit of the jury. Any exhibits that will be used in opening statements must be shown in advance to opposing counsel.

    The Court provides all jurors with a written copy of the final jury instructions so that they may follow along while he reads them and for the jurors' use during deliberations.

    The Court requires that all evidentiary stipulations be in writing signed by counsel, and by the defendant in criminal cases, and expects the parties to stipulate to as many undisputed facts as possible. Testimony presented through deposition (video or by transcript) must be purged of objections well in advance of trial. The Court will establish time limitations for closing arguments. The Court limits closing statements to a reasonable amount of time upon which the parties have agreed in advance and that the Judge has approved.

    Jurors are permitted to take notes. Jurors are not permitted to ask questions of witnesses.

Non-Jury Trials

Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law are required to be submitted at least one week before trial. Each fact should be listed in a separate paragraph supported by a citation to an exhibit or a witness's testimony. The parties are required to provide the Court with a copy of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law on a computer disk or flash drive compatible with the current version of Word.

Print Guideline

All of the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 are enforced. The Court rarely grants a temporary restraining order without notice to the opposite party absent a true emergency, such as where the facts alleged establish that giving notice will precipitate the harm that the TRO seeks to prevent. Parties are encouraged to notify the case manager by telephone upon filing a motion for an injunction so that appropriate scheduling issues can be discussed.

Print All Practice Guidelines

Biography:

The Honorable David M. Lawson was nominated to the United States District Court  by President William Jefferson Clinton on  August 5, 1999, confirmed by a unanimous Senate on May 23, 2000 and began service on August 4, 2000. He graduated magna cum laude from the University of Notre Dame and Wayne State University Law School. After clerkships in the Oakland County Circuit Court (Hon. John N. O'Brien) and the Michigan Supreme Court (Hon. James L. Ryan), he practiced law in small (Lawson & Lawson, P.C.), medium (Lizza, Mulcahy, Casey and Lawson, P.C.) and large (Clark Hill, P.L.C.) law firms in southeastern Michigan for 24 years. His practice areas included criminal defense at both a trial and appellate level; family law; civil tort litigation including medical and legal malpractice, products liability and insurance coverage litigation representing both plaintiffs and defendants; employment litigation; commercial litigation; and transactional work.

Judge Lawson has served as a special assistant attorney general and special prosecutor for the Oakland County one-man grand jury from January 1978 to 1980, and a special prosecutor for Livingston County. He has been a faculty member of the Michigan Judicial Institute since its inception in 1977, and has lectured extensively throughout the country for over 35 years on the subjects of evidence and procedure. He has published several articles on these subjects. He has served as a visiting professor of Evidence and Constitutional Law at Thomas M. Cooley Law School and has served as a lecturer at the University of Detroit Law School, the Institute for Continuing Legal Education (ICLE), the Wayne County Clinical Advocacy Program, and several state and local Bar Association seminars.

Opinions:

25-20030: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICARDO FONVILLE

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

2/9/2026

24-11229: PAUL SATKOWIAK and PRIZZA SATKOWIAK v. BRIAN MARSHALL and JUSTIN SMITH

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

5/6/2026

25-20165: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MATTHEW WEISS

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S "OMNIBUS" MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT

7/6/2026

25-10181: LYNETTE BASON v. VILLAGE SQUARE CONSUMER HOUSING COOPERATIVE and KIRKPATRICK MANAGEMENT COMPANY

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

7/8/2026

23-12113: MAISOON RENICK, personal representative of the Estate of SELENA PEREZ v. DEARBORN HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT #7, AARON MOLLETT, and DR. TYRONE WEEKS

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN STATE LAW CLAIMS, AND DISMISSING CASE

1/16/2025

24-51057: J. ALEX HALDERMAN v. HERRING NETWORKS, INC., et al.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO QUASH OR MODIFY NON-PARTY SUBPOENA

1/24/2025

08-13845: ALTER DOMUS, LLC v. LARRY J. WINGET and the LARRY J. WINGET LIVING TRUST

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO HOLD DEFENDANT LARRY J. WINGET IN CIVIL CONTEMPT OF COURT

2/14/2025

03-80139: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHRISTOPHER LEE BENSON

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE

3/10/2025

18-20198: DENVER LEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE

3/7/2025

24-51057: J. ALEX HALDERMAN v. HERRING NETWORKS, INC. et al

OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR INDICATIVE RULING

5/19/2025

24-11007: KENNETH JAMES WILKINSON v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

6/13/2025

23-10439: RUBICON REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, BROWNE DESIGN CONSULTANTS, LLC, and JOSEPH BROWN v. CITY OF PONTIAC and GARLAND S. DOYLE

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

7/2/2025

24-12661: GENERIS ENTERTAINMENT, LLC v. MARY ANNE DONLEY et al.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CERTAIN MOTIONS TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT

7/8/2025

24-13195: DIAMOND WILLIAMS v. MASTRONARDI PRODUCE-USA, INC.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

7/31/2025

23-20138: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. QUINTON HOLMES

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EARLY TERMINATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE

8/14/2025

08-13845: ALTER DOMUS, LLC v. LARRY J. WINGET and the LARRY J. WINGET LIVING TRUST

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDICIAL SALE AND CONFIRMING JUDICIAL SALE

9/9/2025

08-13845: ALTER DOMUS, LLC v. LARRY J. WINGET and the LARRY J. WINGET LIVING TRUST

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER HOLDING DEFENDANT LARRY J. WINGET IN CIVIL CONTEMPT OF COURT

9/23/2025

08-13845: ALTER DOMUS, LLC v. LARRY J. WINGET and the LARRY J. WINGET LIVING TRUST

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RENEW JUDGMENT

9/25/2025

23-10458: ALTER DOMUS, LLC v. LARRY J. WINGET and JVIS-USA, LLC

OPINION AFTER TRIAL

9/30/2025

24-10799: PAUL RIETHMEIER, as guardian of the estate of REX RIETHMEIER, a protected person and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES v. OAKLAND COUNTY et al.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10/30/2025

92-81127: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GREGORY BROWN

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR BOND

11/13/2025

24-11713: VALERIE WALENCIK v. KOSTAL KONTAKT SYSTEME, INC.

ORDER CONDITIONALLY APPROVING RENEWED JOINT MOTION TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

11/14/2025

25-11964: BRIAN C. MENGE v. LRIS, LLC; and KHURSHEED ASH-SHAFII

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE AMENDED COMPLAINT

12/19/2025

16-10728: RJ CONTROL CONSULTANTS, INC. and PAUL E. ROGERS v. MULTIJECT, LLC, RSW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, and JACK ELDER

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES

1/16/2024

16-10277: CONCERNED PASTORS FOR SOCIAL ACTION et al. v. NICK A. KHOURI et al.

ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CONTEMPT

3/12/2024

22-3040: IN RE: CHRYSLER PACIFICA FIRE RECALL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

2/5/2024

22-11126: APRIL MALICK, ROB MALICK et al. v. CROSWELL-LEXINGTON DISTRICT SCHOOLS, CROSWELL-LEXINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION, DAN GILBERTSON, and KYLE WOOD

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

2/20/2024

24-10287: CITY OF PONTIAC v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF PONTIAC VEBA TRUST

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

2/29/2024

16-20414: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARCUS GILBERT

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE

5/15/2024

23-51467: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DONALD STANLEY LAVIGNE and STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART GOVERNMENT’S REQUEST FOR A CONTINUING WRIT OF GARNISHMENT

5/20/2024

16-20414: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALVIN COATES

ORDER DENYING REDUCTION OF SENTENCE

6/11/2024

23-20275: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TYRESE MARTEZ JONES

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT

7/2/2024

22-12021: LAURA BENY v. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN BOARD OF REGENTS, and MARK M. WEST

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

7/17/2024

21-11494: GREGORY TUCKER v. RANDEE REWERTS

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

8/1/2024

24-20429: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANOTNIO JOHNSON

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS INDICTMENT

11/8/2024

24-20083: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TYRESE JOHNSON

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE AND MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT

10/29/2024

20-13293: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA

ORDER GRANTING IN PART MONITOR'S MOTION TO ENFORCE CONSENT DECREE AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CLARIFY CONSENT DECREE

12/16/2024

24-20151: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MAHDI HOWARD

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

12/23/2024

21-11297: BROAD-OCEAN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. BO LEI

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

1/9/2023

18-20495: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IBRAHEEM IZZY MUSAIBLI

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR MISTRIAL

1/30/2023

21-20355: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DONALD STANLEY LAVIGNE

OPINION AFTER TRIAL

2/14/2023

20-12521: ENERGY MICHIGAN, INC., and ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESSES ADVOCATING TARIFF EQUITY v. DANIEL C. SCRIPPS et al.

OPINION AFTER TRIAL

2/24/2023

16-10277: CONCERNED PASTORS FOR SOCIAL ACTION et al. v. NICK A. KHOURI et al.

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' FIFTH MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

2/24/2023

15-20743: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DUANE LETROY BERRY

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE CERTIFICATE OF MENTAL DISEASE OR DEFECT AND DANGEROUSNESS

6/30/2023

20-10323: OPERATING ENGINEERS' LOCAL 324 FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS AND TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS' LOCAL 324 FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS V. RIETH-RILEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

7/6/2023

22-10947: FRANKLIN CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC v. AUSTIN BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC, and MXT SOLUTIONS, LLC

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS

6/7/2023

16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION (MDL No. 2744)

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND DENING MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS

8/3/2023

21-51597: IN RE: GARY NITZKIN

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REINSTATEMENT

8/18/2023

21-12099: THE CUSTARD HUT FRANCHISE LLC V. H & J JAWAD LLC D/B/A THE CUSTARD COMPANY et al.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO AMEND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

10/11/2023

20-13124: DOMINIQUE RAMSEY and TRAVIS SAMMONS v. DAVID RIVARD et al.

OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT WITNESSES

9/26/2023

22-md-03040: IN RE: CHRYSLER PACIFICA FIRE RECALL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 3040

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED MASTER COMPLAINT

12/11/2023

23-10408: COAST-TO-COAST PRODUCE, LLC et al. v. LAKESIDE PRODUCE USA, INC. et al.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE, AND DISSOLVING STAY OF DISCOVERY

12/29/2023

20-13124: DOMINIQUE RAMSEY and TRAVIS SAMMONS v. DAVID RIVARD, DOUGLAS GOUGH, MARK J. GAERTNER, and COUNTY OF SAGINAW

OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT WITNESSES

9/26/2023

21-12099: THE CUSTARD HUT FRANCHISE LLC v. H & J JAWAD LLC d/b/a THE CUSTARD COMPANY, THE CUSTARD COMPANY — AMOCO LLC, and THE CUSTARD COMPANY — HEIGHTS LLC

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO AMEND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

10/11/2023

23-10408: COAST-TO-COAST PRODUCE, LLC, FRESH ALLIANCE, LLC, and GLOBALMEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. LAKESIDE PRODUCE USA, INC. et al.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE, AND DISSOLVING STAY OF DISCOVERY

12/29/2023

16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION MDL No. 2744

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION STYLED AS MOTION TO DECERTIFY ISSUE CLASSES

1/4/2022

17-10657: PATTI JO CAHOO, et al.v. FAST ENTERPRISES LLC., et al

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION

1/18/2022

20-12521: ENERGY MICHIGAN, INC., et al v. DANIEL C. SCRIPPS, et al

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

2/23/2022

16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION MDL No. 2744

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

3/31/2022

16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION MDL No. 2744

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT CRAIG ROSENBERG

4/4/2022

16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION MDL No. 2744

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT

4/5/2022

16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION MDL No. 2744

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEAL AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

4/13/2022

21-10790: GREEN GENIE, INC. and ALVIN ALOSACHI v. CITY OF DETROIT, et al

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

4/18/2022

19-11044: WESLEY WON et al. v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SEAL AND UNSEALING DOCUMENTS

7/27/2022

19-11044: WESLEY WON, et al. v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC

OPINION AND ORDER ON VARIOUS MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY

7/27/2022

21-12740: CHARLES L. GARAVAGLIA and MARY ANN GARAVAGLIA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

12/29/2022

07-20189: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT McDONEL

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE

1/13/2021

09-20129: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v TOMMY JACKSON

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE

1/25/2021

19-12624: 7-ELEVEN, INC., v CJ-GRAND, LLC and ROBERT TAYLOR

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT

2/8/2021

20-10323: OPERATING ENGINEERS’ LOCAL 324 FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS and TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS’ LOCAL 324 FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS v. RIETH-RILEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.,

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND DISMISSING OTHER PENDING MOTIONS

2/4/2021

19-13374: RIC-MAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. PIONEER SPECIAL RISK INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. d/b/a PIONEER UNDERWRITERS

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

2/26/2021

19-20840: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ASHLEY TOWNSEND

CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION TO ACCEPT PLEA AGREEMENT

3/1/2021

17-10657: PATTI JO CAHOO, et al v. FAST ENTERPRISES, LLC., et al

OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

3/25/2021

20-11071: MARINA TOMA v. REBECCA ADDUCCI et al.

OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

4/23/2021

17-10657: PATTI JO CAHOO, et. al v. FAST ENTERPRISES LLC, et. al

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO INTERVENE

5/4/2021

20-12521: ENERGY MICHIGAN, INC., and ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESSES ADVOCATING TARIFF EQUITY v. DANIEL C. SCRIPPS, et al

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

7/15/2021

21-10737: MARK TRZECIAK and JULIE TRZECIAK v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS

10/29/2021

20-20476: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTONIO DORAN CHANDLER

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

11/10/2021

21-10255: ANDREW HESS v. POSITIVE ENERGY FLEET, LLC.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

11/18/2021

18-20495: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IBRAHEEM IZZY MUSAIBLI

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS CUSTODIAL STATEMENTS AND ELECTRONIC MESSAGES

12/13/2021

18-20495: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IBRAHEEM IZZY MUSAIBLI

ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES REGARDING POTENTIAL ATTORNEY CONFLICT OF INTEREST

12/7/2021

21-20432: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LASAIL HAMILTON

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART GOVERNMENT’S MOTION IN LIMINE

12/2/2021

20-13293: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION BY JAMES R. COAKLEY FOR APPEAL OF AN INTERPRETIVE RULING OF THE DEFENDANT’S CONSTITUTION

7/1/2021

19-10662: OAK POINT PARTNERS, LLC. v BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

3/17/2020

18-13727: GRAMINEX, L.L.C. v. AKTIEBOLAGET CERNELLE aka A.B. CERNELLE COMPANY

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

3/31/2020

20-10699: OLIVER NISSAN AWSHANA, et al. v. REBECCA ADDUCCI, et al.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

4/9/2020

19-11138: KHALED ABDO AHMED, and 85 OTHER PERSONS v. STEPHEN MILLER, DONALD J. TRUMP, et al

SECOND ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE CLAIMS OF CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS

4/7/2020

19-13153: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD and BLUE CROSS NETWORK OF MICHIGAN v ENDO PHARAMACEUTICALS, TEIKOKU PHARMA USA, INC., et al

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND

4/14/2020

19-13577: PEGGY LYNN TORPEY, TIMOTHY J. MILLER, Chapter 7 Trustee v. PHILIP SANDELL

OPINION

4/30/2020

05-80955: UNITED STATES of AMERICA v. DEMETRIOUS FLENORY

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR RESENTECING, RELEASE, OR RECOMMENDATION

5/5/2020

19-13638: PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION, INC. v JANICE M. WINFREY and GEORGE AZZOUZ

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF DETROIT AND MICHIGAN TO INTERVENE AS PARTIES DEFENDANTS

5/28/2020

19-10485: MICHIGAN MOTOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, QUASHING SERVICE OF PROCESS, AND ORDERING PROPER SERVICE

7/10/2020

17-20467: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ZAHIR SHAH

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE

8/4/2020

14-20542: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CYNTHIA LONDON-CLAYTON

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO MODIFY RESTITUTION ORDER

9/16/2020

19-12755: REGINA CROCHERON v STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY AND SUBSTITUTING PARTY PLAINTIFF

9/22/2020

07-20222: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RODOLFO MORENO

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE

11/12/2020

17-11356: LEONARD WARE v. SHAWN BREWER

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

11/23/2020

19-11044: RICHARD FRANCIS, WESLEY WON, DENNIS SPEERLY, et al v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

11/30/2020

18-20183: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TERRELL WHITE

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE

12/9/2020

17-10657: PATTI JO CAHOO, et al v. FAST ENTERPRISES LLC., et al

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS

12/22/2020

18-20633: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v DELMAL LAMAR MYERS

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

1/23/2019

16-10655: CHRISTOPHER DIBBLE v. PAUL KLEE

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

2/4/2019

17-12468: DARREN SENSAT v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

3/4/2019

11-20594: GERALD LEE DUVAL and JEREMY DUVAL vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE AND MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE

3/30/2019

17-10657: PATTI JO CAHOO et al. v. SAS INSTITUTE INC, et al.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA AND ORDERING COMPLIANCE

4/23/2019

16-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION MDL No. 2744

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO SEAL CERTAIN DOCUMENTS

5/1/2019

17-13062: DAVONTAE SANFORD v. MICHAEL RUSSELL and JAMES TOLBERT

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE VARIOUS DEFENSE EXPERT WITNESSES

5/9/2019

17-13062: DAVONTAE SANFORD v. MICHAEL RUSSELL and JAMES TOLBERT

CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

5/15/2019

16-11546: SHAUNA M. MOTE, et. al v CITY OF CHELSEA, et. al

OPINION AFTER TRIAL

7/3/2019

18-13359: LESLIE D. NOLAN v DETROIT EDISON COMPANY, et.al

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT

7/9/2019

18-12713: MICHELLE N. PEARL v. COMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

OPINION

7/27/2019

18-12792: CHRISTOPHER OGDEN v. LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC. and LC TRADEMARKS, INC.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

7/29/2019

01-20057: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DRAMOND D. HICKS

Corrected Opinion and Order Granting Motion for Resentencing

12/11/2019

14-14792: JEFFREY DURK CARTER v. PAUL KLEE

OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

2/5/2018

17-11259: SOUTHFIELD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, et al. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SOUTHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS and SOUTHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS

3/27/2018

16-14406: EARL CROSBY, et al. v. TWITTER, INC., et al.

CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE

3/30/2018

17-11085: RAFAEL LINARES v. WARDEN J.A. TERRIS

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

4/9/2018

18-50368: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT A. GROSS

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING ALEC LANG’S MOTION FOR RECOGNITION AS CRIME VICTIM

4/17/2018

17-11259: SOUTHFIELD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, et al., v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SOUTHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al.

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION, STAY, AND CERTIFICATION

6/11/2018

16-12799: FRISKE v. BONNIER CORPORATION

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT

7/26/2018

16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

9/12/2018

18-11858: Kent v. McDermott

Opinion

10/23/2018

17-12320: SUSAN WHITE, et al v. FCA US, LLC and CLARENCE HEATH

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

11/19/2018

16-2744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS ALLEGING FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

11/28/2018

17-13062: DAVONTAE SANFORD v. CITY OF DETROIT, MICHAEL RUSSELL, and JAMES TOLBERT

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

12/4/2018

17-13909: HENKEL OF AMERICA, INC. v. CRAIG M. BELL and KNIGHT CAPITAL PARTNERS CORP.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

12/17/2018

17-12214: OMAR BATSON v. GENESEE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY HOOVER et al.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

12/21/2018

16-10277: CONCERNED PASTORS FOR SOCIAL ACTION, et al. v. NICK A. KHOURI, et al.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION BY ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL SCHUETTE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF

1/23/2017

16-11605: THOMAS MITCHELL, et. al v. COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH OF CENTRAL MICHIGAN, et al

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MOTIONS TO DISMISS

3/22/2017

16-14048: IN RE: PATRICK GEORGE, Debtor / SELWAN KESTO, Appellant v. PATRICK GEORGE, Appellee

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL

4/11/2017

16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION

4/19/2017

16-12022: KNIGHT CAPITAL PARTNERS CORP. v. HENKEL AG & COMPANY, KGAA

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

6/23/2017

16-12652: BIG CITY SMALL WORLD BAKERY CAFÉ, LLC v. FRANCIS DAVID CORPORATION d/b/a ELECTRONIC MERCHANT SYSTEMS

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR COMPEL ARBITRATION

7/14/2017

16-13085: ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v JESSE LEVINE, et al

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

7/26/2017

16-13088: PRODUCTIVITY TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION v JESSE LEVINE, et al

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS

7/26/2017

16-10885: JESA ENTERPRISES LTD v THERMOFLEX CORPORATION v SILAGY MURDOCH GROUP, INC, et al

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO STRIKE TESTIMONY OF PROPOSED EXPERT WITNESSES

7/28/2017

17-10369: JASON C. THOMPKE and MELISSA J. THOMPKE v. FABRIZIO & BROOK, P.C.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

8/14/2017

05-10036: CURTIS PARKS v MILLICENT WARREN

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (AFTER REMAND)

9/28/2017

16-10782: JAMES BRIDGEWATER v MICHIGAN GAMING CONTROL BOARD

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESCHEDULING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE

10/10/2017

17-12107: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY v. CITY OF FLINT and FLINT CITY COUNCIL

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10/23/2017

16-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS ALLEGING FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

11/15/2017

17-12320: SUSAN WHITE, et al v FCA US, LLC and CLARENCE HEATH

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND AND MOTION TO DISMISS

11/16/2017

16-12342: YARMOUTH COMMONS ASSOCIATION v. PAMELA NORWOOD and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

12/8/2017

17-11169: MICHAEL MATTIA v. CITY OF CENTER LINE, MICHIGAN. et al.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

12/18/2017

14-10713: DAVID HUNT and CAROL SANTANGELO v. DONNELLY HADDEN, and DONNELLY W. HADDEN, P.C.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEY’S FEES

2/4/2016

15-10525: TANGANEKA L. PHILLIPS v. UAW INTERNATIONAL, et al.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

3/4/2016

16-10254: NISAR NAJMUDDIN MULLA v REBECCA ADDUCCI, et al.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

4/14/2016

15-13708: LITTLE RIVER BAND OF OTTAWA INDIANS and its EMPLOYEE WELFARE PLAN v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS

4/29/2016

15-13543: COSME CRUZ and SHIRLEANN CRUZ v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE

6/28/2016

15-10466: KATIE REDMOND, Personal Representative of the Estate of Herbert Redmond, deceased v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS TO PROHIBIT PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED EXPERT WITNESSES FROM TESTIFYING AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

7/15/2016

16-10277: CONCERNED PASTORS FOR SOCIAL ACTION et al. v. NICK A. KHOURI et al.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS

7/15/2016

15-14276: IN RE: RENEE D. NEWELL, Debtor / WAYNE COUNTY, Appellant v. RENEE D. NEWELL, Appellee

OPINION

7/27/2016

15-11276: MICHAEL MUNGER v. FIRST NATIONAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC., and RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PETITIONS FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES

7/27/2016

07-20265: THOMAS VANBUHLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE

8/4/2016

15-20112: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RONNELL LEESHAWN MARTIN

ORDER SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO PRESENTENCE REPORT

8/30/2016

16-13233: QUICKEN LOANS, INC. v. RE/MAX, LLC.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

10/31/2016

16-10277: CONCERNED PASTORS FOR SOCIAL ACTION, et. al, v. NICK A. KHOURI, et. al.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

11/17/2016

16-12866: 679637 ONTARIO LTD. v. ALPINE SIGN & PRINTER SUPPLY, INC. and MARABU NORTH AMERICA, L.P.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT ALPINE'S MOTION TO DISMISS

11/23/2016

16-10277: CONCERNED PASTORS FOR SOCIAL ACTION, et al., v. NICK A. KHOURI, et al.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

12/8/2016

13-13761: CHARLES SHEHEE v. SAGINAW COUNTY and PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC.,

Opinion and Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Dismissing Amended Complaint

1/8/2015

13-13938: ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY f/k/a Royal Indemnity Company v. THE CITY OF WARREN, MICHIGAN, et. al

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE, DISMISSING PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS AS MOOT, AND CLOSING CASE

1/8/2015

14-20117: United States of America v. Xavier Giovanni Deleon

Opinion and Order Denying Motion to Suppress Evidence

2/3/2015

11-14603: Tad Dewulf v. Kenneth McKee

Opinion and Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

3/24/2015

10-13762: SAMANTHA BACHYNSKI v. MILLICENT WARREN

OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

4/2/2015

10-13762: Bachynski v. Warren

Order Granting Respondent's Motion for Stay Pending Appeal

5/6/2015

15-10475: Peguese v. PNC Bank NA and Dominic Goyette

Opinion and Order Dismissing Case for Want of Jurisdiction

5/6/2015

03-20008: JAMES ROY SYLVESTER, JR., v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE

6/22/2015

14-14430: CH HOLDING COMPANY and CH/BRAND PARKING ASSOCIATES v. MILLER PARKING COMPANY, et. al.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND

6/29/2015

14-14832: IN RE: MILLER PARKING COMPANY, LLC. v. BASIL T. SIMON, Bankruptcy Trustee of the Bruce H. Miller Bankruptcy Estate, et. al

OPINION

7/31/2015

13-13804: BOWLERS' ALLEY, INC. v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY

OPINION AND ORDER ON DAMAGES ISSUES

8/13/2015

14-14668: Ingenium Technologies Corp V. Beaver Aerospace & Defense, Inc

Opinion And Order Conditionally Granting Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss For Forum Non Conveniens

8/18/2015

14-10713: DAVID HUNT and CAROL SANTANGELO v. DONNELLY HADDEN and DONNELLY W. HADDEN, P.C.

SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

9/8/2015

15-12471: JONATHAN MCCORMACK v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY

OPINION AND ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT

9/17/2015

15-11512: MICHIGAN FLYER, LLC and INDIAN TRAILS, INC., v. WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING CERTAIN OTHER MOTIONS AS MOOT

10/14/2015

14-10527: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. GOYETTE MECHANICAL COMPANY, INC., et al.

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION BY E.L. MECHANICAL, INC. TO AMEND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND GRANTING PNC BANK’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

10/23/2015

12-14874: LONDONE LEE SYKES, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES

11/19/2015

15-12470: MICHIGAN PROTECTION & ADVOCACY SERVICE, INC., V. FLINT COMMUNITY SCHOOLS AND LARRY WATKINS, JR.

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

11/25/2015

14-12214: K.S. v. DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al

MEMORANDUM ORDER FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENTS

12/23/2015

13-13804: Bowlers' Alley, Inc v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company

Opinion and Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss

7/18/2014

13-11436: Malibu Media, LLC. v. Kurt Schelling

Opinion and Order Granting in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment

7/18/2014

07-11141: Michael Louis Cristini v. City of Warren, et. al

Opinion and Order on Motions to Determine Attorney's Lien

7/14/2014

14-10299: Atmosphere Hospitality Management Services, LLC v. Royal Realities, LLC., et. al

Opinion and Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Disqualify Counsel, Staying Case, and Authorizing Immediate Appeal

7/1/2014

12-13083: Mike Vaughn Custom Sports, Inc. v. Chrystem "Chris" Piku, et. al

Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Piku and Piku Management Company

4/29/2014

14-10527: PNC Bank, National Association v. Goyette Mechanical Company, Inc., et. al

Opinion and Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Receiver, Denying Goyette Defendants' Motion for Contempt, and Vacating Injunction

4/29/2014

10-14028: James Holland Jr. v. Steven Rivard

Opinion and Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

4/3/2014

09-12950: United States Security and Exhange Comission v. John J. Bravata, et. al

Opinion and Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment

3/13/2014

13-20182: United States of America v. Brent Mckinney

Opinion and Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal

3/13/2014

09-14642: Palmer v. Flore, Hensley, et. al

Opinion and Order Adjudicating Affirmative Defense of Exhaustion of Remedies

3/3/2014

13-10627: Jozef Dybek and Irena Dybek v. Fedex Trade Networks Transport & Brokerage, Inc.

Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment

2/20/2014

13-13804: Bowler's Alley, Inc., v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company

Opinion and Order Granting in Part Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counter-Complaint

8/26/2014

13-12803: Ricardo Sherman v. United States of America

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE

9/30/2014

13-13350: DEBRA WITHERELL on behalf of M.D.H., a minor v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

OPINION

9/30/2014

11-12031: LUVIQ PLUMAJ v. RAYMOND BOOKER

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT

10/10/2014

14-12078: SHELBY WEIGANDT v. FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et. al

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS

10/9/2014

13-13938: ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY fka Royal Indemnity Company v. THE CITY OF WARREN, MICHIGAN, et al

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECUSE

10/23/2014

14-10076 & 14-11440: STEFANO SPIGNO, ANN. E. BLAAUW v. PRECISION PIPELINE, LLC, and ALAN GANSCH

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO AMEND COMPLAINT

11/14/2014

13-20423: United States of America v. Jimmie Eugene White II

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE

11/24/2014

13-11049: Numatics, Inc. v. Balluff, Inc., and H.H. Barnum Company

OPINION AND ORDER ON PARTIES’ MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY

12/17/2014

14-13398: UNITED STATES ex rel. WALTER TOEBE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. THE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

12/17/2014

11-12344: 360 CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., v. ATSALIS BROTHERS PAINTING CO.,et. al

Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment

1/3/2013

12-14300: KHALIL FAREED v. G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA) INC., et. al

Opinion and Order Denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Directing Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint

5/6/2013

12-14460: COUNTY OF GENESEE, et al. v. GREENSTONE FARM CREDIT SERVICES, et. al

Opinion and Order Dening Plaintiffs' Motions for Summary judgment, Granting Defendatns' Motion for Summary Judgment, and Dismissing Case

9/12/2013

05-10172: ANTONIO GARCIA-DORANTES v. MILLICENT WARREN

Judgment

10/1/2013

10-20535: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BOBBY W. FERGUSON, et. al

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BOBBY W. FERGUSON, et. al

2/16/2012

10-12886: STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY v. JAMES AND RENAY WILSON

STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY v. JAMES AND RENAY WILSON

2/16/2012

11-11602: TRUSTEES OF PLASTERS LOCAL 67 PENSION TRUST FUND et. al v. MARTIN MCMAHON PLASTERING, INC.

TRUSTEES OF PLASTERS LOCAL 67 PENSION TRUST FUND et. al v. MARTIN MCMAHON PLASTERING, INC.

2/23/2012

11-13613: THOMAS DELAZZER v. MITCH PERRY

THOMAS DELAZZER v. MITCH PERRY

2/23/2012

11-14512: LARRY R. TALTON and STACIE C. TALTON v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP

LARRY R. TALTON and STACIE C. TALTON v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP

3/15/2012

10-20436: UNITED STATES of AMERICA v. THEODORE COOPER STEWART

UNITED STATES of AMERICA v. THEODORE COOPER STEWART

3/15/2012

11-12948: 1200 Sixth Street, LLC, v. USA

1200 Sixth Street, LLC, v. USA

3/16/2012

10-13000: CHILDREN’S LEGAL SERVICES, PLLC, v. SHOR LEVIN AND DERITA, PC

CHILDREN’S LEGAL SERVICES, PLLC, v. SHOR LEVIN AND DERITA, PC

3/29/2012

11-20594: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GERALD LEE DUVAL, JR and JEREMY DUVAL

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GERALD LEE DUVAL, JR and JEREMY DUVAL

4/4/2012

08-11564: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $463,497.72 IN U.S. CURRENCY FROM BEST BANK, et. al

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $463,497.72 IN U.S. CURRENCY FROM BEST BANK, et. al

4/4/2012

11-12344: 360 CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. ATSALIS BROTHERS PAINTING CO., et. al

360 CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. ATSALIS BROTHERS PAINTING CO., et. al

4/13/2012

10-20535: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BOBBY W. FERGUSON, et. al

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BOBBY W. FERGUSON, et. al

6/1/2012

07-15152: James Redmond v. James Worthington and Kenneth J. Aud

James Redmond v. James Worthington and Kenneth J. Aud

7/23/2012

10-12427: City of Detroit v. State of Michigan and Comcast of Detroit, and Michigan Attorney General

City of Detroit v. State of Michigan and Comcast of Detroit, and Michigan Attorney General

7/23/2012

12-20092: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUSSAIN N. ABDULKADIN

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUSSAIN N. ABDULKADIN

7/25/2012

11-15169: MICHAEL J. BAKER and SUZIE C. BAKER v. RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, and ORLANS ASSOCIATES, P.C.,

MICHAEL J. BAKER and SUZIE C. BAKER v. RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, and ORLANS ASSOCIATES, P.C.,

8/21/2012

11-15521: KURT D. GREGORY v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., et. al

KURT D. GREGORY v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., et. al

9/12/2012

10-13870: TIANA HOWARD-JOHNSON v. V&S DETROIT GALVANIZING, LLC

TIANA HOWARD-JOHNSON v. V&S DETROIT GALVANIZING, LLC

9/27/2012

12-11282: MT. CLEMENS AUTO CENTER INC. v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA

MT. CLEMENS AUTO CENTER INC. v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA

10/11/2012

10-20163: United States of America v. Anthony Johnson

United States of America v. Anthony Johnson

10/18/2012

11-11930: PATRICIA A. KIENZLE v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC.

PATRICIA A. KIENZLE v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC.

11/1/2012

12-10629: CH Holding Company, et al. v Miller Parking Company, et.al

CH Holding Company, et al. v Miller Parking Company, et.al

11/8/2012

11-13985: S.A. RESTAURANTS, INC. v. ANDREW J. DELONEY

S.A. RESTAURANTS, INC. v. ANDREW J. DELONEY

12/20/2012

10-13008: ETERNAL PRESERVATION ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff and counter-defendant v. ACCIDENTAL MUMMIES TOURING, Defendant and counter-plaintiff v. WOLF CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC., Third-party defendant.

ETERNAL PRESERVATION ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff and counter-defendant v. ACCIDENTAL MUMMIES TOURING, Defendant and counter-plaintiff v. WOLF CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC., Third-party defendant.

1/6/2011

10-12285: THE MASON AND DIXON LINES, INC., UNIVERSAL AM-CAN, LTD., and MASON DIXON INTERMODAL, INC. v. KIRK T. STEUDLE and TED B. WAHBY, et. al

THE MASON AND DIXON LINES, INC., UNIVERSAL AM-CAN, LTD., and MASON DIXON INTERMODAL, INC. v. KIRK T. STEUDLE and TED B. WAHBY, et. al

1/20/2011

09-12950: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. JOHN J. BRAVATA, et. al

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. JOHN J. BRAVATA, et. al

2/1/2011

09-12950: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. JOHN J. BRAVATA, et. al

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. JOHN J. BRAVATA, et. al

2/1/2011

08-10166: United States of America v. Gordon H. Porath and Georgina M. Porath

United States of America v. Gordon H. Porath and Georgina M. Porath

2/17/2011

10-12539: Ralph E. Smith, Jr. v. Michigan Department of Corrections, et. al

Ralph E. Smith, Jr. v. Michigan Department of Corrections, et. al

2/24/2011

05-10036: CURTIS PARKS v. MILLICENT WARREN

CURTIS PARKS v. MILLICENT WARREN

3/14/2011

05-10172: ANTONIO GARCIA-DORANTES v. MILLICENT WARREN

ANTONIO GARCIA-DORANTES v. MILLICENT WARREN

3/14/2011

10-12513: HARRY O. LUTZ and PAULA G. LUTZ v. STEWART MICHIGAN TITLE et. al

HARRY O. LUTZ and PAULA G. LUTZ v. STEWART MICHIGAN TITLE et. al

3/14/2011

10-12427: City of Detroit v. Comcast of Detroit, Inc., f/k/a Comcast Cablevision of Detroit, Inc.

City of Detroit v. Comcast of Detroit, Inc., f/k/a Comcast Cablevision of Detroit, Inc.

3/24/2011

10-14078: Tax Increment Finance Authority and City of Dearborn Heights v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Project Control Systems, Inc.

Tax Increment Finance Authority and City of Dearborn Heights v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Project Control Systems, Inc.

3/24/2011

10-10099: TODD D. DENNIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

TODD D. DENNIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

3/31/2011

09-14851: Robert Allen King v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

Robert Allen King v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

3/31/2011

08-11564: United States of America v. STACEY HOGAN GIANOPLOS et. al

United States of America v. STACEY HOGAN GIANOPLOS et. al

3/31/2011

07-13839: DAVID McCLOY v. CORRECTION MEDICAL SERVICES, et.al

DAVID McCLOY v. CORRECTION MEDICAL SERVICES, et.al

4/14/2011

10-14928: Humphres,B.O.C. Law Group, P.C. v. Carroll

Humphres,B.O.C. Law Group, P.C. v. Carroll

4/19/2011

11-50051: OCEANFIRST BANK v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

OCEANFIRST BANK v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY

5/5/2011

09-14377: ELIZABETH SANDERS and JUDE BECKOWITZ v. ADRIENNE M. STANLEY, D.O. et. al

ELIZABETH SANDERS and JUDE BECKOWITZ v. ADRIENNE M. STANLEY, D.O. et. al

5/20/2011

10-10401: Trans-Industries, Inc, Solon v. Allard

Trans-Industries, Inc, Solon v. Allard

5/24/2011

11-10694: Sleiman v. National Casualty Insurance and Zurich American Insurance

Sleiman v. National Casualty Insurance and Zurich American Insurance

6/1/2011

09-12280: Jessen v. Cigna Group Insurance et. al.

Jessen v. Cigna Group Insurance et. al.

6/21/2011

98-10153: Muhammad v. Close

Muhammad v. Close

7/13/2011

11-11121: Partlow v. Person

Partlow v. Person

7/13/2011

05-72126: Fharmacy Records v. Salaam Nassar,Curtis Jacson,ET AL.

Fharmacy Records v. Salaam Nassar,Curtis Jacson,ET AL.

7/18/2011

09-13897: BARBARA L. CORWIN et. al v. LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CO., f.k.a. LANDAMERICA TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE CO.,

BARBARA L. CORWIN et. al v. LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CO., f.k.a. LANDAMERICA TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE CO.,

8/4/2011

09-13621: THELESTER MAHONE v. PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 636 FRINGE BENEFITS FUND

THELESTER MAHONE v. PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 636 FRINGE BENEFITS FUND

8/12/2011

10-11923: FREMONT REORGANIZING CORP v. RONNIE DUKE, et.al

FREMONT REORGANIZING CORP v. RONNIE DUKE, et.al

9/15/2011

07-14369: Hertz v. Miller

Hertz v. Miller

9/21/2011

08-10085: GEORGE GERARD BURGER v. JOHN PRELESNIK

GEORGE GERARD BURGER v. JOHN PRELESNIK

9/30/2011

08-13236: Austin v. Redford Township Police Department

Austin v. Redford Township Police Department

9/30/2011

10-11676: Murphy v. Lockhart, Birkett, Bowerson, Krajnik, Bearss, Werner, Berry, Bauman and Sherry

Murphy v. Lockhart, Birkett, Bowerson, Krajnik, Bearss, Werner, Berry, Bauman and Sherry

9/30/2011

08-01684: J.D. Fuller v. Blaine Lafler

J.D. Fuller v. Blaine Lafler

10/12/2011

11-10016: First American Title Insurance Company v. Bryan Pazdzierz

First American Title Insurance Company v. Bryan Pazdzierz

10/24/2011

11-10513: Bajraszewski v. Allstate Insurance Company

Bajraszewski v. Allstate Insurance Company

10/20/2011

04-74514: Laborers Pension Trust Fund-Detroit and Vicinity, et. al. v. Interior Exterior Specialists Company et.al.

Laborers Pension Trust Fund-Detroit and Vicinity, et. al. v. Interior Exterior Specialists Company et.al.

11/2/2011

10-14727: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS OF LLOYDS, LONDON v. US INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, LLC et. al

CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS OF LLOYDS, LONDON v. US INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, LLC et. al

11/17/2011

11-13470: KENYATTA BANTOM v. DTE ENERGY COMPANY

KENYATTA BANTOM v. DTE ENERGY COMPANY

12/1/2011

10-12526: SALLY HILDEN and JEROME FLYNN v. HURLEY MEDICAL CENTER et. al

SALLY HILDEN and JEROME FLYNN v. HURLEY MEDICAL CENTER et. al

12/8/2011

11-14878: Mt. Cleens Auto Center, Inc. v. Hyundai Motor America

Mt. Cleens Auto Center, Inc. v. Hyundai Motor America

12/12/2011

07-10631: JULIE A PUCCI v. CHIEF JUDGE MARK W. SOMERS

JULIE A PUCCI v. CHIEF JUDGE MARK W. SOMERS

12/22/2011

11-13665: LARRY McGHEE v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.

LARRY McGHEE v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC.

12/22/2011

06-14286: STADLER vs. CURTIN

STADLER vs. CURTIN

1/22/2010

09-11430: Systematic Recycling v. City of Detroit et al

Systematic Recycling v. City of Detroit et al

2/17/2010

08-14125: Fieger v. Federal Election Commission

Fieger v. Federal Election Commission

2/26/2010

08-11842: Lanier v. Metorpolitan Life Insurance Company

Lanier v. Metorpolitan Life Insurance Company

3/9/2010

09-12226: Lee v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund

Lee v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund

3/15/2010

09-12101: Heidenbreicht v. Nevilog Inc

Heidenbreicht v. Nevilog Inc

3/30/2010

09-12472: Yaldu v. Bank of America

Yaldu v. Bank of America

3/31/2010

08-13926: Paeth v. Worth Township et. al.

Paeth v. Worth Township et. al.

4/9/2010

09-14445: General Motors v. Dinatale

General Motors v. Dinatale

4/9/2010

09-20415: USA v. Stewart

USA v. Stewart

5/24/2010

02-20043-BC: USA v. David Goward

USA v. David Goward

6/17/2010

06-15024 and 06-15637: Proposition 2

Proposition 2

6/17/2010

09-11061: ERNEST DURMISHI v. NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY

ERNEST DURMISHI v. NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY

6/30/2010

08-12586: Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund et. al. v. Palladium Equity Partners, LLC et. al

Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund et. al. v. Palladium Equity Partners, LLC et. al

7/14/2010

08-12586: Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund, et. al. v. Palladium Equity Partners, LLC, et. al

Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund, et. al. v. Palladium Equity Partners, LLC, et. al

7/14/2010

09-13396: Kiesgen v. St. Clair Marine Salvage, Inc

Kiesgen v. St. Clair Marine Salvage, Inc

7/12/2010

09-11111: Prestige Capital Corp. v. Michigan Gage and Manufacturing, LLC et. Al

Prestige Capital Corp. v. Michigan Gage and Manufacturing, LLC et. Al

7/12/2010

05-72126: Fharmacy Records and Shelton Rivers v. Salaam Nassar et al.

Fharmacy Records and Shelton Rivers v. Salaam Nassar et al.

7/23/2010

09-14682: Maxine White and James Flanders, III v. Loomis Armored US, Inc.

Maxine White and James Flanders, III v. Loomis Armored US, Inc.

7/28/2010

09-20581: USA v. Brady Muse, Jr.

USA v. Brady Muse, Jr.

8/2/2010

09-13007: JOHN SEARCY v. COUNTY OF OAKLAND et al.

JOHN SEARCY v. COUNTY OF OAKLAND et al.

9/2/2010

08-13926: GEORGE T. PAETH and MARGARET C. PAETH v. WORTH TOWNSHIP and BARBARA CUTCHER

GEORGE T. PAETH and MARGARET C. PAETH v. WORTH TOWNSHIP and BARBARA CUTCHER

9/2/2010

10-10975: Arrington v. Michigan Bell Telephone

Arrington v. Michigan Bell Telephone

9/29/2010

09-13447: Ericka Savage v. City of Pontiac, Emergency Financial Manager Fred Leeb and Larry Marshall

Ericka Savage v. City of Pontiac, Emergency Financial Manager Fred Leeb and Larry Marshall

9/30/2010

09-14171: Jane Price v. Hartford Life And Insurance Company

Jane Price v. Hartford Life And Insurance Company

10/12/2010

09-14288: Ernest Payton v. Saginaw County Jail

Ernest Payton v. Saginaw County Jail

10/12/2010

10-10975: Wendy A. Arrington v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company

Wendy A. Arrington v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company

9/29/2010

09-11191: Gillespie v. Commissioner of Social Security

Gillespie v. Commissioner of Social Security

10/14/2010

09-14781: Kalich v. AT&T Mobility, LLC

Kalich v. AT&T Mobility, LLC

11/2/2010

10-11588: Morris v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Joyce M. Sandige

Morris v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Joyce M. Sandige

11/17/2010

10-11989: TIMOTHY KROPF v. TCA, Inc, d/b/a THE COLLECTION AGENCY, and REBECCA PARKS

TIMOTHY KROPF v. TCA, Inc, d/b/a THE COLLECTION AGENCY, and REBECCA PARKS

11/23/2010

08-12525: Belfor USA Group, Inc. v. Insurance Reconstruction, LLC and Brad Barrett

Belfor USA Group, Inc. v. Insurance Reconstruction, LLC and Brad Barrett

12/10/2010

09-12226: Lee v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund

Lee v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund

12/20/2010

06-11925: Kent Jones v. Bency Mathai

Kent Jones v. Bency Mathai

12/27/2010

01-10247-BC: SUPPLEMENT TO OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

SUPPLEMENT TO OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

1/29/2009

01-14995: Warrior Sports, Inc., v. STX, L.L.C

Warrior Sports, Inc., v. STX, L.L.C

1/30/2009

05-10266: Al-Timii v. Jackson

Al-Timii v. Jackson

2/17/2009

08-15264: David Maguire and Carole Maguire v. Genesee Couty Sheriff, et .al

David Maguire and Carole Maguire v. Genesee Couty Sheriff, et .al

2/17/2009

08-13800: Galka v. Caruso

Galka v. Caruso

2/18/2009

05-10304: Allen v. Howes

Allen v. Howes

2/25/2009

08-10557: Pucci v. Michigan Supreme Court, et. al.

Pucci v. Michigan Supreme Court, et. al.

3/3/2009

07-10631: Pucci v. 19th District Court and Chief Judge Mark W. Somers

Pucci v. 19th District Court and Chief Judge Mark W. Somers

3/6/2009

08-12080: OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE

3/27/2009

08-10269: Lowe Order Adoptiong and Rejecting R&R

Lowe Order Adoptiong and Rejecting R&R

3/27/2009

08-11564: USA v. $464,479.72, et al

USA v. $464,479.72, et al

3/31/2009

07-13888: Haynor v. General Motors

Haynor v. General Motors

3/30/2009

08-11365: Bradford v. Wurm et. al

Bradford v. Wurm et. al

4/6/2009

07-50329: Final Judgment Under Rule 54(b) Denying Comerica Bank's Motion

Final Judgment Under Rule 54(b) Denying Comerica Bank's Motion

5/18/2009

07-50329: Opinion on Final Judgment Denying Comerica Bank's Motion to Set Aside Forfeiture

Opinion on Final Judgment Denying Comerica Bank's Motion to Set Aside Forfeiture

5/18/2009

07-50329: Opinion and Order Denying Comerica Bank's Motion to Set Aside Forfeiture

Opinion and Order Denying Comerica Bank's Motion to Set Aside Forfeiture

5/14/2009

06-14431 (civil) 99-20011 (criminal) : Robinson v. United States of America

Robinson v. United States of America

7/14/2009

06-15381 (cv) 99-20011 (cr): Robinson v. United States of America

Robinson v. United States of America

7/22/2009

08-10813: Tribble v. Chuff et. al

Tribble v. Chuff et. al

7/28/2009

07-14772: Lynk v. Chase Home Finance

Lynk v. Chase Home Finance

7/29/2009

08-14877: Michael Carter v. D. Dolce

Michael Carter v. D. Dolce

8/19/2009

06-11728: Curry et. al. v. SBC Communications

Curry et. al. v. SBC Communications

10/30/2009

08-14272: ETHEL M. OSLER vs HURON VALLEY AMBULANCE INCORPORATED

ETHEL M. OSLER vs HURON VALLEY AMBULANCE INCORPORATED

12/3/2009

02-10277: Barbrasue Beattie, et. al. v. Centurytel, Incorporated

Barbrasue Beattie, et. al. v. Centurytel, Incorporated

12/7/2009

06-14888: SPX Order Re Opinions of Counsel

SPX Order Re Opinions of Counsel

1/8/2008

06-14888: SPX Order Re Claims

SPX Order Re Claims

1/14/2008

08-10570: Norfolk Opinion on Preliminary Injunction

Norfolk Opinion on Preliminary Injunction

2/26/2008

06-15024: Proposal 2: Motion Granting Summary Judgment

Proposal 2: Motion Granting Summary Judgment

3/18/2008

05-15024: Proposal 2: Miscellaneous Motions

Proposal 2: Miscellaneous Motions

3/18/2008

04-10224: McBroom Opinion Granting Habeas Corpus

McBroom Opinion Granting Habeas Corpus

4/3/2008

05-72126: Fharmacy Opinion on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment

Fharmacy Opinion on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment

4/3/2008

04-10322: Randle Opinion Denying Habeas Corpus

Randle Opinion Denying Habeas Corpus

4/3/2008

07-15322: Hoving Opinion

Hoving Opinion

4/23/2008

07-20477: Crockett Opinion on Suppression Motion

Crockett Opinion on Suppression Motion

4/25/2008

06-14312: LL NJ Opinion Denying Cross

LL NJ Opinion Denying Cross

4/28/2008

04-60270: Limbright Opinion Granting Judgment

Limbright Opinion Granting Judgment

5/6/2008

07-10742: Bobbitt Opinion and Order Granting Class Cert

Bobbitt Opinion and Order Granting Class Cert

5/1/2008

06-14888: SPX Order Granting Reconsideration of Claims

SPX Order Granting Reconsideration of Claims

5/20/2008

07-20265: Vanbuhler Sentencing

Vanbuhler Sentencing

5/19/2008

07-15268: WG Heating Granting MSJ

WG Heating Granting MSJ

5/14/2008

07-11367: Burgess Order Denying MSJ

Burgess Order Denying MSJ

5/27/2008

07-10919: Thompson Bey Order Adopting R&R and Denying Dismissal

Thompson Bey Order Adopting R&R and Denying Dismissal

5/27/2008

07-13198: Keaik Opinion on Cross MSJs

Keaik Opinion on Cross MSJs

6/2/2008

07-12950: Lipa Opinion Granting Motion to Dismiss

Lipa Opinion Granting Motion to Dismiss

5/30/2008

07-13306: Equipements Opinion Granting Stay

Equipements Opinion Granting Stay

6/17/2008

06-11728: Curry Opinion Denying Class Cert

Curry Opinion Denying Class Cert

6/23/2008

07-11707: Denying Reconsideration of Order Disqualifying Counsel

Denying Reconsideration of Order Disqualifying Counsel

7/14/2008

05-10152: Au Sable Order re R&R and MSJs

Au Sable Order re R&R and MSJs

7/14/2008

07-10631: Pucci Opinion on MSJ

Pucci Opinion on MSJ

7/14/2008

07-10773: Ellis Order Adopt in part R&R, Deny Motion to Dismiss

Ellis Order Adopt in part R&R, Deny Motion to Dismiss

7/14/2008

05-10156: Phipps Opinion Denying Habeas Corpus

Phipps Opinion Denying Habeas Corpus

7/21/2008

05-10196: Stewart Opinion Granting Habeas Corpus

Stewart Opinion Granting Habeas Corpus

7/25/2008

05-10194: Anderson Opinion Denying Habeas Corpus

Anderson Opinion Denying Habeas Corpus

7/30/2008

07-12254: Chesterfield Opinion on Cross MJSs

Chesterfield Opinion on Cross MJSs

8/11/2008

05-10036: Parks Opinion Adopting and Rejecting HC R&R

Parks Opinion Adopting and Rejecting HC R&R

7/31/2008

06-14888: SPX Order Overruling Obj to Sanction Order

SPX Order Overruling Obj to Sanction Order

8/4/2008

05-72126: Fharmacy Opinion on Motions

Fharmacy Opinion on Motions

8/21/2008

07-13256: Pankey Opinion

Pankey Opinion

8/22/2008

07-10742: Bobbitt Order re Discovery

Bobbitt Order re Discovery

9/2/2008

99-10274: Opinion Denying Absolute Writ (Scott v. Bock)

Opinion Denying Absolute Writ (Scott v. Bock)

9/18/2008

08-11704: New Vision Opinion Granting Motion to Dismiss

New Vision Opinion Granting Motion to Dismiss

10/2/2008

08-12964: Cambell Bankruptcy Application Opinion

Cambell Bankruptcy Application Opinion

10/27/2008

07-15366: FTSS Order Dismissing

FTSS Order Dismissing

10/27/2008

06-45: Miller Opinion Adopting R&R

Miller Opinion Adopting R&R

11/6/2008

07-20477: Crockett Opinion on Motions in limine

Crockett Opinion on Motions in limine

11/14/2008

07-20513: United States of America v. Bryan Ross

United States of America v. Bryan Ross

11/25/2008

05-10152: Anglers or the Au Sable, et. al. v. United States Forest Service, et. al

Anglers or the Au Sable, et. al. v. United States Forest Service, et. al

12/8/2008

07-14036: James Perry and Dominque Yarbro v. City of Pontiac, et. al.

James Perry and Dominque Yarbro v. City of Pontiac, et. al.

12/8/2008

08-13066: Sidney High, personal representative of the Estate of Vunies B. High, deceased v. Capital Senior Living Properties 2 - Heatherwood, Inc.,

Sidney High, personal representative of the Estate of Vunies B. High, deceased v. Capital Senior Living Properties 2 - Heatherwood, Inc.,

12/17/2008

06-15024: Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, et. al. v. The Regents of the University of Michigan, et. al.

Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, et. al. v. The Regents of the University of Michigan, et. al.

12/11/2008

07-20513: USA v. Burston

USA v. Burston

11/26/2008

06-cv-15024: Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, et al., v. Jennifer Granholm, et al.

Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, et al., v. Jennifer Granholm, et al.

1/5/2007

05-40277: CHESTERFIELD MARKET, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

CHESTERFIELD MARKET, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

1/8/2007

05-60293: LAITH HIRMUZ, LUAI HIRMUZ, et al. v CITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS et al.

LAITH HIRMUZ, LUAI HIRMUZ, et al. v CITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS et al.

1/3/2007

06-13641: KAY ANGELA HANIF et. al. v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

KAY ANGELA HANIF et. al. v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

1/16/2007

04-10050: JACK LOYD ADAMS v. SHERRY L. BURT

JACK LOYD ADAMS v. SHERRY L. BURT

1/24/2007

06-13221: WILLIAM E. BENNETT v. AMERICA ONLINE, INC. et. al.

WILLIAM E. BENNETT v. AMERICA ONLINE, INC. et. al.

1/23/2007

04-10341: DAVID DUNNING v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE

DAVID DUNNING v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE

1/18/2007

99-cv-10176: Julie Olden, et al., v. Lafarge Corporation

Julie Olden, et al., v. Lafarge Corporation

1/29/2007

04-10312: RAY BORDEAU v. SAGINAW CONTROL & ENGINEERING, INC.

RAY BORDEAU v. SAGINAW CONTROL & ENGINEERING, INC.

2/2/2007

06-13792: NARTRON CORPORATION v. QUANTUM RESEARCH GROUP, LTD.

NARTRON CORPORATION v. QUANTUM RESEARCH GROUP, LTD.

2/12/2007

03-cv-10312: AMOS BEECHY et. al. v. CENTRAL MICHIGAN DISTRICT et. al.

AMOS BEECHY et. al. v. CENTRAL MICHIGAN DISTRICT et. al.

2/23/2007

06-cv-15021: ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN, INC. v. CITY OF DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS et. al.

ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN, INC. v. CITY OF DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS et. al.

2/23/2007

04-74514: LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND et al. v. INTERIOR EXTERIOR SPECIALISTS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. et al

LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND et al. v. INTERIOR EXTERIOR SPECIALISTS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. et al

3/26/2007

05-73669: WILLIAM KUCHARSKI, SR. et al. v. TODD LEVEILLE et al.

WILLIAM KUCHARSKI, SR. et al. v. TODD LEVEILLE et al.

3/26/2007

05-10235: SUSAN T. FIGGINS v. ADVANCE AMERICA CASH ADVANCE CENTERS OF MICHIGAN, INC et. al.

SUSAN T. FIGGINS v. ADVANCE AMERICA CASH ADVANCE CENTERS OF MICHIGAN, INC et. al.

3/27/2007

05-73793: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. CURRENCY $11,331

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. CURRENCY $11,331

3/27/2007

05-10245: OLLIE HERRIN et. al. v. TROOPER ROBERT DUNHAM et. al.

OLLIE HERRIN et. al. v. TROOPER ROBERT DUNHAM et. al.

4/6/2007

04-20027: BRIAN MAURICE PATTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BRIAN MAURICE PATTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

6/20/2007

04-20014: REGINALD STEVENSON, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

REGINALD STEVENSON, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

7/23/2007

04-cv-71885: Victor T. Weber v. Thomas Van Fossen, et al

Victor T. Weber v. Thomas Van Fossen, et al

7/19/2007

05-cv-10323: James Abner, III, et al, v. County of Saginaw County, et al

James Abner, III, et al, v. County of Saginaw County, et al

7/19/2007

06-cv-10353: Comerica Inc., v. Zurich American Insurance Co., et al

Comerica Inc., v. Zurich American Insurance Co., et al

7/27/2007

05-cv-10020: ROLAND J. BOURGEOIS v. LARN STRAWN

ROLAND J. BOURGEOIS v. LARN STRAWN

8/10/2007

07-12415: Vericorr Order of Dismissal

Vericorr Order of Dismissal

8/16/2007

04-10080: Brown Opinion Denying HC

Brown Opinion Denying HC

8/31/2007

04-cv-10018: Reginald Lett v. Paul Renico

Reginald Lett v. Paul Renico

8/31/2007

05-10200: KATIE ANNE PLATTE et. al. v. THOMAS TOWNSHIP et. al.

KATIE ANNE PLATTE et. al. v. THOMAS TOWNSHIP et. al.

9/27/2007

04-10336: Lang Opinion on Cross MSJs

Lang Opinion on Cross MSJs

10/11/2007

03-10254: KEVIN TUCKER v. JOHN CASON

KEVIN TUCKER v. JOHN CASON

10/23/2007

07-12484 : SANDRA C. PEPPERS vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

SANDRA C. PEPPERS vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

11/29/2007

06-14835: Iverson Opinion on Cross MSJs

Iverson Opinion on Cross MSJs

12/7/2007

05-73669: Kucharski Opinion Granting Reconsideration

Kucharski Opinion Granting Reconsideration

12/7/2007

04-10326: Long Opinion Granting Habeas Corpus

Long Opinion Granting Habeas Corpus

12/13/2007

07-12254: Chesterfield Opinion Striking Jury Demand

Chesterfield Opinion Striking Jury Demand

12/20/2007

03-10259: Thoroughbred Opinion Denying Motion for Attorney's Fees

Thoroughbred Opinion Denying Motion for Attorney's Fees

12/20/2007

01-10134-BC: TROY D. PALUSKA V. BARBARA BOCK

TROY D. PALUSKA V. BARBARA BOCK

1/13/2006

04-10042-BC: FRANK LONG v. DR. MARK ADAMS and SAGINAW VALLEY NEUROSURGERY, P.C.

FRANK LONG v. DR. MARK ADAMS and SAGINAW VALLEY NEUROSURGERY, P.C.

1/23/2006

05-10307-BC: DARRELL COWEN and TERESSA COWEN v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC.

DARRELL COWEN and TERESSA COWEN v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC.

1/31/2006

05-10204-BC: INTERMODAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. NORMAN Y. MINETA, et al.

INTERMODAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. NORMAN Y. MINETA, et al.

2/7/2006

04-10120-BC: ERIC CARLYLE DEAN et al v. CITY OF BAY CITY, ROBERT V. BELLEMAN et al

ERIC CARLYLE DEAN et al v. CITY OF BAY CITY, ROBERT V. BELLEMAN et al

2/16/2006

04-10075: ROBERT SHIMKUS et al. v. THOMAS HICKNER et al

ROBERT SHIMKUS et al. v. THOMAS HICKNER et al

2/28/2006

02-10277-BC: BARBRASUE BEATTIE et al v. CENTURYTEL, INCORPORATED

BARBRASUE BEATTIE et al v. CENTURYTEL, INCORPORATED

3/10/2006

03-CV-10083-BC: RICHARD DRESSER et al v. CRADLE OF HOPE ADOPTION CENTER,

RICHARD DRESSER et al v. CRADLE OF HOPE ADOPTION CENTER,

3/23/2006

05-10089-BC: JEANETTE BEEKER et al. v. HENRY LEWIS et al.

JEANETTE BEEKER et al. v. HENRY LEWIS et al.

2/13/2006

03-10011-BC: DIAMOND COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. v. SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

DIAMOND COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. v. SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,

3/27/2006

00-10095-BC: DOUGLAS KIM ELLER v. BARBARA BOCK

DOUGLAS KIM ELLER v. BARBARA BOCK

3/27/2006

04-10355-BC: DENISE HUGHES et al. v. REGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING et al.

DENISE HUGHES et al. v. REGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING et al.

3/28/2006

06-11016-BC: MATTHEW DUBAY v. LAUREN WELLS et al.

MATTHEW DUBAY v. LAUREN WELLS et al.

6/20/2006

02-20016: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES HOWARD LAUGHTON

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES HOWARD LAUGHTON

6/26/2006

05-10137-BC: STEVE MONTLE v. WESTWOOD HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et. al.

STEVE MONTLE v. WESTWOOD HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et. al.

6/15/2006

03-cv-10122: Wesley Seal v. John Alden Life Insurance Company

Wesley Seal v. John Alden Life Insurance Company

7/13/2006

04-cr-20026: United States of America v. Timothy E. Wirth

United States of America v. Timothy E. Wirth

7/13/2006

06-11016-BC: MATTHEW DUBAY v. LAUREN WELLS et al.

MATTHEW DUBAY v. LAUREN WELLS et al.

7/17/2006

03-10259: THOROUGHBRED SOFTWARE v. DICE CORPORATION, CLIFFORD et al.

THOROUGHBRED SOFTWARE v. DICE CORPORATION, CLIFFORD et al.

7/21/2006

05-10265: KAREN ANDERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

KAREN ANDERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

7/27/2006

05-20043: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KEITH E. KALLSTROM

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KEITH E. KALLSTROM

8/30/2006

00-10204: DONNELL LAMAR HANNAH v. BARBARA BOCK,

DONNELL LAMAR HANNAH v. BARBARA BOCK,

8/25/2006

04-10312: RAY BORDEAU v. SAGINAW CONTROL & ENGINEERING, INC.

RAY BORDEAU v. SAGINAW CONTROL & ENGINEERING, INC.

8/24/2006

03-10103: MICHAEL D. GREENE v. BLAINE LAFLER

MICHAEL D. GREENE v. BLAINE LAFLER

8/23/2006

04-10013: ROBERT G. DUNN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al.

ROBERT G. DUNN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al.

8/22/2006

06-12425: RONALD HACKER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al.

RONALD HACKER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al.

9/1/2006

05-10020: ROLAND J. BOURGEOIS v. LARN STRAWN

ROLAND J. BOURGEOIS v. LARN STRAWN

8/31/2006

04-10143: JOEL CURRY, et al. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF et al.

JOEL CURRY, et al. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF et al.

9/18/2006

05-1032: TRUSTEES OF THE FLINT AREA SHEET et al. v. C3 MECHANICAL, INC.

TRUSTEES OF THE FLINT AREA SHEET et al. v. C3 MECHANICAL, INC.

9/26/2006

05-10096: LISA O’CONNOR v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT COMPANY

LISA O’CONNOR v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT COMPANY

9/25/2006

05-10322: JACKIE WARREN DEMIJOHN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

JACKIE WARREN DEMIJOHN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY

10/23/2006

04-cv-20038: United States of America v. David Warren Tice, Jr.

United States of America v. David Warren Tice, Jr.

10/30/2006

06-14290: ANTON DELJEVIC v. ROBIN BAKER et al.

ANTON DELJEVIC v. ROBIN BAKER et al.

11/6/2006

02-10149: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARION L. KINCAID TRUST et. al.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARION L. KINCAID TRUST et. al.

11/3/2006

06-13166: SALOM ENTERPRISES, LLC. v. TS TRIM INDUSTRIES, INC.

SALOM ENTERPRISES, LLC. v. TS TRIM INDUSTRIES, INC.

11/27/2006

04-cv-10148: Donna UHL, et al., v. Pacific Employer's Insurance Company

Donna UHL, et al., v. Pacific Employer's Insurance Company

12/8/2006

06-cv-15024: COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION et. al. v. JENNIFER GRANHOLM et. al.

COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION et. al. v. JENNIFER GRANHOLM et. al.

12/19/2006

01-cv-10337: Linda Rose, et al., v. Saginaw County, et al.

Linda Rose, et al., v. Saginaw County, et al.

11/21/2005

05-cv-10135: Eddie Pritchett v. Marlene Johnson

Eddie Pritchett v. Marlene Johnson

11/8/2005

05-cv-10009: General Motors Corporation, et al., v. Hirschfield Steel Service Center, Inc., et al.

General Motors Corporation, et al., v. Hirschfield Steel Service Center, Inc., et al.

11/8/2005

02-cv-10319: Stephen Zervan v. Maday Construction, Incorporated, et al.

Stephen Zervan v. Maday Construction, Incorporated, et al.

10/31/2005

02-cv-10042: Michael V. Doughty v. Henry Grayson

Michael V. Doughty v. Henry Grayson

10/31/2005

05-cv-10100: Concerned Citizens of Caro v. Michigan Ethanol, L.L.C., et al

Concerned Citizens of Caro v. Michigan Ethanol, L.L.C., et al

10/26/2005

04-cv-10309: Eryc Young v. Hightower, et al.

Eryc Young v. Hightower, et al.

10/18/2005

04-cv-10292: Linda M. Portwood v. Commissioner of Social Security

Linda M. Portwood v. Commissioner of Social Security

10/13/2005

04-cv-10364: Tracy L. Clark v. Aetna Life Insurance Company

Tracy L. Clark v. Aetna Life Insurance Company

9/26/2005

99-cv-10090: Michael Ford v. Resident Unit Manager Rodda, et al.

Michael Ford v. Resident Unit Manager Rodda, et al.

9/26/2005

03-cv-10115: Wayne Morris Wallace v. Thomas K. Bell

Wayne Morris Wallace v. Thomas K. Bell

8/31/2005

00-cv-10002: Keith Davis Weiner v. Barbara N. Bock

Keith Davis Weiner v. Barbara N. Bock

8/29/2005

05-cv-20008: United States of America v. William Edwin Popham, et al.

United States of America v. William Edwin Popham, et al.

8/15/2005

01-cv-10294: Carol Ege v. Joan Yukins

Carol Ege v. Joan Yukins

7/22/2005

03-cv-20025: United States of America v. Kenneth Kenny

United States of America v. Kenneth Kenny

7/8/2005

04-cv-10195: Ronald Schroeder v. City of Vassar, et al.

Ronald Schroeder v. City of Vassar, et al.

5/25/2005

05-cv-10084: J. Lewis Cooper Company, et al. v. Diageo North America, et al.

J. Lewis Cooper Company, et al. v. Diageo North America, et al.

5/20/2005

04-cv-10066: Kenneth Krupa v. Commissioner of Social Security

Kenneth Krupa v. Commissioner of Social Security

4/19/2005

05-cv-10008: Westfield Insurance Corporation v. Mainstream Capital Corporation

Westfield Insurance Corporation v. Mainstream Capital Corporation

4/19/2005

03-cv-10234: Norman H. Redfield v. Commissioner of Social Security

Norman H. Redfield v. Commissioner of Social Security

4/5/2005

04-cv-10281: Frederick Allen Kennedy v. R.W.C., Inc. et al.

Frederick Allen Kennedy v. R.W.C., Inc. et al.

3/16/2005

02-cv-10169: Peter D. Yuch v. Commissioner of Social Security

Peter D. Yuch v. Commissioner of Social Security

3/16/2005

02-cv-10161: David H. McLean v. Commissioner of Social Security

David H. McLean v. Commissioner of Social Security

3/16/2005

02-cv-10292: Wayne Edward Houck v. Commissioner of Social Security

Wayne Edward Houck v. Commissioner of Social Security

2/9/2005

03-cv-10083: Dresser et. al. v. Cradle of Hope Adoption Center, et. al

Dresser et. al. v. Cradle of Hope Adoption Center, et. al

2/9/2005

04-cv-10102: Detmar Finke v. Kirtland Community College Board of Trustees, et al.

Detmar Finke v. Kirtland Community College Board of Trustees, et al.

2/9/2005

04-cv-10133: Thomas Neuenfeldt v. Williams Township

Thomas Neuenfeldt v. Williams Township

2/9/2005

01-cv-10337: Linda Rose, et al., v. Saginaw County, et al.

Linda Rose, et al., v. Saginaw County, et al.

1/25/2005

03-cv-20064: United States of America v. Santana Romero Dottery

United States of America v. Santana Romero Dottery

1/24/2005

04-cv-10206: James Wineman, et al. v. Durkee Lakes Hunting & Fishing Club, Incorporated

James Wineman, et al. v. Durkee Lakes Hunting & Fishing Club, Incorporated

1/13/2005

99-cv-20060: United States of America v. Michael J. Kuhn

United States of America v. Michael J. Kuhn

1/12/2005

01-cv-10354: Karen Stead v. Commissioner of Social Security

Karen Stead v. Commissioner of Social Security

1/10/2005

02-CV-10318: Choice L. Causey and Henretta Denise Bradley v. City of Bay City, et al.

Choice L. Causey and Henretta Denise Bradley v. City of Bay City, et al.

1/6/2005

04-cv-10051: Eric E. Brege v. Lakes Shipping Company, Incorporated, et al.

Eric E. Brege v. Lakes Shipping Company, Incorporated, et al.

12/29/2004

02-cv-10087: Clarence Young v. Commisioner of Social Security

Clarence Young v. Commisioner of Social Security

12/22/2004

03-cv-10226: Justin Jamison v. Dow Chemical Company

Justin Jamison v. Dow Chemical Company

12/20/2004

02-cv-10285: Theresa Brandt, et al. v. Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc., et al.

Theresa Brandt, et al. v. Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc., et al.

12/14/2004

04-cv-10098: Frank Van Wulfen v. Montmorency County, et al.

Frank Van Wulfen v. Montmorency County, et al.

11/10/2004

01-cv-10312: Alexander N. Smith, by his parents Kenneth W. Smith and Janet S. Smith v. Mount Pleasant Public Schools

Alexander N. Smith, by his parents Kenneth W. Smith and Janet S. Smith v. Mount Pleasant Public Schools

12/23/2003

99-cv-10441: Jimmie Bentley v. Barbara Bock

Jimmie Bentley v. Barbara Bock

12/31/2002

00-cv-10485: Gary Majeske v. Bay City Board of Education

Gary Majeske v. Bay City Board of Education

12/27/2001

00-cv-10209: Chris Mehney-Egan v. Mendoza

Chris Mehney-Egan v. Mendoza

11/30/2000