Judge David M. Lawson
Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse
231 W. Lafayette Blvd., Room 775
Detroit, MI 48226
Courtroom: Room 767
Chambers Telephone: (313) 234-2660
Chambers Fax: (313) 234-2669
Case Manager: Susan Pinkowski - (313) 234-2662 - susan_pinkowski@mied.uscourts.gov
Court Reporter: Rene Twedt - (313) 234-2613
Chambers staff is happy to answer questions about chambers procedures. HOWEVER, please consult the Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures, the Local Rules, the case docket (if applicable) and the information on this website before contacting Chambers with a question.
The Judge prefers that papers submitted electronically to chambers be in the current version of Word.
Local Rules are enforced - please pay particular attention to L.R.7.1, and Electronic Filing Rules 5 and 9(d).
Stipulations should be e-filed through the CM/ECF system. However, proposed Orders regarding those Stipulations should be directed to Chambers via the link located under the Utilities section in CM/ECF. Please consult Rule 12 of the ECF Policies and Procedures for additional information regarding Proposed Orders. Stipulations combined with orders are discouraged.
The short statements (pleading format, double spaced) required by the Notice of the Case Management and Scheduling Conference should be e-mailed to Chambers at susan_pinkowski@mied.uscourts.gov. They are not to be e-filed.
The Court encourages the use of modern technology to display exhibits and demonstrative aides during trial. However, prior arrangements must be made with Chambers staff. Requests for interpreters and accommodations for witnesses with disabilities should be made with Chambers at least one week before needed.
If a case is settled, the parties must notify Chambers in writing via email or telefax by the next business day.
If you do not have the current version of Adobe, please download it.
All removed cases are reviewed. A standing order for removal is issued in many cases, to which the removing party must respond within seven (7) days. If jurisdiction is questionable, an order to show cause will be issued. Motions to remand must be filed within 30 days of removal.
Civil Cases
The Court conducts an initial case management and scheduling conference, which must be attended in person by counsel, preferably lead counsel. A notice generally will be sent within two to four weeks after a responsive pleading is filed. The notice informs the parties to submit to chambers (but not e-file) a short statement describing the case and addressing matters that will be discussed at the conference, or if they can agree, docket a joint Rule 26(f) statement which should include all the items described in the conference notice..
At the initial case management and scheduling conference the parties are expected to be prepared to summarize the case and the issues and to discuss subject matter jurisdiction. Parties also must discuss alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options with their clients. A case management and scheduling order is completed at the initial case management and scheduling conference, with input from the parties.
Subsequent status conferences are also scheduled periodically by the Court. Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) will be addressed, and counsel should discuss ADR options with clients before the status conference. Counsel may request additional status conferences to be conducted in person or by telephone by contacting the case manager.
A final pretrial conference and settlement conference is scheduled approximately two weeks before the trial date. The proposed Joint Final Pretrial Order must be submitted to Chambers, not e-filed, at least one week before the scheduled final pretrial conference date. Please note that the section of the Case Management and Scheduling Order prescribing the contents of the Joint Final Pretrial Order may supercede portions of E.D. Mich L.R.16.2 in some instances. The Case Management and Scheduling Order controls.
Criminal Cases
The Court will issue a scheduling order. Requests to change or enlarge calendar dates must be made by motion. The Court usually addresses those requests on the record. A final pretrial conference is conducted by the Court, as noted in the section on Pretrials.
Judge Lawson accepts no ex parte communications. Counsel may contact the Case Manager or the judge's Judicial Assistant with respect to procedural and scheduling matters only. Questions about pending cases should be directed to the Case Manager. Contact by counsel or parties with the law clerks is discouraged.
Bail
Arraignments and initial bail and detention determinations generally are conducted by the magistrate judge. Review of those decisions is by written motion, which the Court will address promptly. Counsel must furnish a copy of the motion to review a detention order to the assigned pretrial services officer.
Pleas
There is a strong preference that plea agreements be in writing. Judge Lawson does not object to plea agreements that involve sentencing recommendations under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(c)(1)(B) or (C). In the Criminal Trial Notice and Scheduling Order, the Court will establish a plea cut-off deadline and final pretrial date approximately two weeks before trial beyond which no plea agreements will be accepted.
Discovery Procedures
Unless there is a well-founded concern for the safety of the witness, the parties are strongly encouraged to provide Jencks and reciprocal Jencks material no later than the day before the final pretrial conference and plea cut-off date, or sooner if the parties agree.
Presence of the Defendant
The defendant must be present at all court hearings unless prior permission to be absent is obtained from the Court. If a writ is required, it must be submitted four weeks before the court date.
Sentencing Practices
Sentencing recommendations of the probation officer are not divulged. Counsel must raise any objections to presentence investigative reports, guideline computations, and other such matters in writing before sentencing in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 32(b)(6). The procedure for filing objections and a sentencing memorandum is set forth in the Court's Standing Order Prescribing Sentencing Procedures. If a party intends to present witnesses at a sentencing hearing, the party must contact the case manager one week in advance to advise.
The parties are encouraged to conduct their Rule 26(f) discovery conference before the case management and scheduling conference established by the Court. The disclosure requirements of Rule 26(a)(1) generally will be required by the Court 14 days after the case management and scheduling conference. Dates for disclosure of expert information contemplated by Rule 26(a)(2) generally will be established at the case management and scheduling conference. The parties are encouraged to summarize discovery disputes and email a joint letter to the Court, schedule a telephone conference, and discuss the issue before filing discovery motions. Discovery motions generally are referred to the magistrate judge for disposition. Once a motion has been referred, all communication regarding that motion should be directed to the magistrate judge's chambers.
When applying for an internship, please submit your cover letter, resume, transcript, and writing sample via U.S. mail or email to chambers at Susan_Pinkowski@mied.uscourts.gov.
Applications should be submitted to chambers at least two months before the anticipated start date.
Discovery motions may be referred to the magistrate judge. Once a motion has been referred, all communication regarding that motion should be directed to the magistrate judge's chambers.
The Court strictly enforces the requirements of Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 5.1 and Local Rule 7.1 and the Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures for all motions. Failure to follow these rules likely will result in a denial of the motion and may lead to sanctions.
The Court requires strict compliance with LR 7.1(a), which requires moving parties to seek concurrence before filing a motion. The Court requires that a good-faith effort be made to obtain concurrence, which normally involves actual voice contact with opposing counsel. If no actual conversation occurs, the moving party must show that reasonable efforts were undertaken to conduct a conference and specifically describe those efforts in the motion papers. The outcome of the conference must be stated. All of this must be documented specifically in the motion papers. Failure to comply with LR 7.1 (a) usually results in dismissal of the motion.
Motions must be clear and succinct without extensive factual development. All briefs must comply with Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 5.1 and Local Rule 7.1, and must contain citation of appropriate authorities within the text of the brief (not in footnotes), and citations must conform to the latest edition of The Bluebook: A Uniform System of Citation published by the Harvard Law Review. In addition, briefs must contain a concise statement of facts supported by references to the record. References to the record must conform to Rule 6 of the Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures. Footnotes are discouraged, but if they are utilized they must be printed in the same font size as the text, which may be no smaller than 10-1/2 characters per inch (non-proportional) or 14 point (proportional).
Answers to motions and supporting briefs must be filed according to the schedule set forth in Local Rule 7.1(d). Note that Rule R5(e) of the Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures prohibits combining an answer to a motion with a counter-motion in the same filing. The Court normally does not issue a briefing schedule for motions. The Court enforces the response and reply due dates as set forth in LR 7.1(d) and Fed. R. Civ. P.6, even when the motion hearing is set far in advance. Attorneys who do not respond to motions in a timely fashion are not permitted to argue before the Court during oral argument, if oral argument is scheduled.
Counsel are discouraged from employing elaborate boilerplate recitations of the applicable motion standards and lengthy string citations in support of well-established legal principles. Instead, counsel should focus their analysis on a few well-chosen cases, preferably recent, published, and from controlling courts. When citing unpublished sources, Westlaw references are preferred.
Facts stated in the statement of facts must be supported with citations of either the pleadings, interrogatories, admissions, depositions, affidavits, or documentary exhibits. Exhibits not previously filed should be included with an appendix. The appendix must contain an index. As to cited deposition testimony, counsel are also encouraged to supply the Court with a transcript of cited page(s) together with sufficient accompanying pages to provide context. All citations must have page references. Other documents referred to in the briefs should be included in the appendix. Counsel may highlight their submissions.
When filing a paper in a criminal case through CM/ECF, select ONLY your individual client. Do NOT select all defendants.
Courtesy copies of motions and briefs for motions listed in LR 7.1 (e)(2)(A) must be provided to Chambers. Parties may submit courtesy copies of other motions, exhibits, responses and replies to Chambers. All papers must be firmly bound along the left margin (by binding or in a 3-ring binder) and any exhibits must be properly tabbed.
If a hearing is scheduled, the Court's Case Manager will docket a notice of the hearing date.
The Court endeavors to decide pending motions promptly, ordinarily within six weeks after a hearing, or within three weeks after the time for a response has passed without a response being filed. Complex motions or those raising novel issues may require additional time to conclude. If a motion has been pending in chambers without resolution for an apparently inordinate time, counsel are asked to notify the Court's Case Manager by telephone or in writing (jointly if possible) as to the status of the motion. Such notification is a service that is appreciated by the Court and is not viewed by the Court as inappropriate or impertinent.
If a party intends to call witnesses at a motion hearing, the party must notify Chambers at least two weeks in advance of the hearing date and inform the Case Manager of the anticipated length of time needed for the testimony.
Local Rule 5.3 sets forth in detail the procedure that must be followed before any item may be filed on the docket under seal.
Before docketing any paper under seal, whether it is a motion, an exhibit, or any other item, you must file a motion requesting the Court's permission to file the item under seal. Also, as with any motion, before filing a motion to seal you must seek concurrence from counsel for all other parties, unless the applicable rules of court allow you to seek relief ex parte. Local Rules 5.3 and 7.1 apply in the usual manner to all motions seeking leave for filing items under seal.
If you are seeking to file papers such as certain exhibits with medical or other personal information under seal, but the motion for leave to file under seal does not itself disclose any information that needs to be maintained under seal, then you may e-file the motion for leave (NOT under seal), with the items that you want to have sealed as separately docketed exhibits (under seal), according to the procedure outlined in Local Rule 5.3. Again, keep in mind that you also must comply in the usual way with all other applicable rules of court, such as Local Rule 7.1.
If the motion to seal itself contains information that you believe should be sealed, or if you need to file information under seal that by its nature should not be revealed to opposing counsel (e.g., motions to authorize fees or services in a criminal matter), then you should email the case manager (not docket) the motion or other papers that you want filed under seal, and a motion for leave to file all of the items under seal, each as separate files in Microsoft Word format, using the Utilities function of CM-ECF, which goes directly to the case manager. In this case you SHOULD NOT e-file any of the items in any form, either sealed or unsealed, before sending them via Utilities. The items will be docketed appropriately by the case manager.
In either case, when a motion to seal is docketed or received via Utilities, then the Court will consider whether it should be granted and issue an appropriate order. If you believe that the order granting the motion also should be sealed, then your motion to seal should so state.
Note that in the usual case the Court will not grant requests to seal an entire motion and brief or all associated exhibits where only limited portions of certain exhibits contain sensitive information. The Court also will not grant “sealed motions to seal” where the motion for leave to file under seal does not itself disclose sensitive information or information that should not be divulged to other parties or their counsel. Orders granting motions to seal also typically will not be filed under seal unless docketing the order on the public docket would defeat the purpose of the confidential filing.
Civil Cases
Final pretrial conferences are generally conducted on the date and time set out in the Case Management and Scheduling Order. The form of a Joint Final Pretrial Order is explicitly set forth in the Court's Case Management and Scheduling Order. Please review the Case Management and Scheduling Order before attempting to draft the proposed Joint Final Pretrial Order. Status conferences are scheduled at various times during the pretrial period, and the Court encourages counsel to discuss with each other and their clients all forms of ADR options. The Court especially encourages the use of facilitative mediation. You may contact chambers for a list of suggested facilitators.
Motions in limine are generally to be filed no later than five weeks before the final pretrial conference so that responses can be filed in accordance with E.D. Mich. LR 7.1 and the motions will be ready for decision at the time of the final pretrial conference. Filing deadlines generally are stated in the Case Management and Scheduling Order. Alternately, decisions on motions in limine may be deferred until trial.
Deadlines for filing proposed voir dire questions and jury instructions are set forth in the Case Management and Scheduling Order. Deadlines for submission of proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law in bench trials are set forth in the Case Management and Scheduling Order, but generally must be submitted at least one week before trial.
Criminal Cases
The final pretrial conference is conducted on the record. Counsel of record must attend; stand-ins are not allowed except in extraordinary circumstances, and then only with prior permission of the Court, and with the consent of the client. Deadlines are established at that point for filing jury instructions and proposed voir dire questions. Discussion on the manner of jury selection is held on the record. Defendants must be present for the final pretrial conference. The Court establishes a plea cut-off date, set forth in the Criminal Trial Notice and Scheduling Order, which is enforced. The parties may comply with the plea cut-off date by signing and submitting a Rule 11 agreement on or before the deadline; it is not necessary that a guilty plea be made on the record before the plea cut-off date.
Special Cases
Social Security appeals and pro se prisoner Civil Rights cases are generally referred to the magistrate judge for case management.
General Rule
In all cases, requests for special arrangements such as audio-visual equipment, demonstrative aids, interpreters, and accommodations for witnesses with disabilities, should be made at or before the final pretrial conference. Exhibits must be pre-marked and an exhibit list must be furnished to the Court on a form which is established by the Court. Request for authorization to bring electronic equipment (computers, etc.) into the courtroom should be made at or before the final pretrial conference.
Stipulations should be docketed and a proposed order sent through the Utilities function of CM-ECF.
If either party is pro se, and that party is not an efiler, then the pro se's original wet signature must be on the stipulation.
The Court encourages parties to propose agreed protective orders. Such orders may be requested by docketing a stipulation outlining the proposed terms and submitting a proposed order through the utilities function of CM/ECF. The Court then will review the terms proposed and enter an appropriate order. If either party is pro se, and that party is not an efiler, then the pro se's original wet signature must be on the stipulation. However, stipulations for protective orders may not contain language that authorizes in advance the filing of documents under seal. Filings under seal are governed by Local Rule 5.3, and the Court requires those procedures to be followed. Therefore, proposed stipulations for protective orders MUST contain the following language:
-
Filing Under Seal
This order does not authorize the filing of any documents under seal. Documents may be sealed only if authorized by statute, rule, or order of the Court. A party seeking to have filed under seal any paper or other matter in this case must file and serve a motion that sets forth: (a) the authority for sealing; (b) an identification and description of each item proposed for sealing; (c) the reason that sealing each item is necessary; (d) the reason that a means other than sealing is not available or unsatisfactory to preserve the interest advanced by the movant in support of the seal; and (e) a memorandum of legal authority supporting the seal. See E.D. Mich. LR 5.3; Shane Group, Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 825 F.3d 299 (6th Cir. 2016). With the exception of limited purpose filings allowed by Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 5.3(b)(3)(A)(vi), no party shall file or otherwise tender to the Clerk any item proposed for sealing unless the Court has granted the motion required by this section. Whenever a motion to seal is filed, the movant shall submit a brief that states the particular reason the seal is required. If a motion to seal is granted, then the documents to be sealed may be separately electronically filed under seal.
-
Notice to Designating Party
Any party, other than the Designating Party, that anticipates filing any material that has been designated as Confidential Information must provide reasonable notice to the Designating Party of the proposed filing, so that the Designating Party will have ample time, if it so desires, to file a motion for leave to file the material in question under seal. The parties then shall meet and confer in connection with any anticipated motion for an order authorizing the filing of Confidential Information under seal, in a good faith attempt to reach an agreement regarding whether the Confidential Information should be filed under seal. See E.D. Mich. LR 7.1(a). If an agreement is reached, then the parties may file a joint motion for leave to file under seal, in conformance with paragraph A and Eastern District of Michigan Local Rule 5.3. If an agreement is not reached, then the Designating Party may file a motion in compliance with paragraph A and Local Rule 5.3. If the motion is denied, then the party separately may file the material, but not under seal.
In order to view and print the order(s), Adobe Acrobat Reader is required. To download Adobe Acrobat click here.
CIVIL
- Sample Notice to Appear for Case Management Status and Scheduling Conference
- Sample Notice of Status and Scheduling Conference (for ERISA benefits case)
- Sample Case Management and Scheduling Order
- Sample Patent Case Management and Scheduling Order
- Standing Order Requiring Submission of Information Regarding Removal Cases
If you would like daily copy or real-time services at trial, you must seek permission from the Court before or during your Final Pretrial Conference. Once permission is obtained, you should contact Judge Lawson's court reporter immediately at rene_twedt@mied.uscourts.gov or 313-234-2660, to make payment arrangements.
To order transcripts, review delivery options and rates, access forms, etc., click here
Trials are conducted on Monday through Friday. Jury trials generally will begin on Tuesday. Counsel are expected to be present in court in advance of the start time on trial days. Subject to the Court's availability, after the first trial day trials normally commence at 8:00 a.m. and continue through approximately 2:00 p.m., with two 15- minute breaks. Occasionally, trial days may also consist of 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. and 1:45 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. sessions. The Court establishes the schedule for trials at the commencement of each trial week.
Side bar conferences may be conducted during trial, but counsel are encouraged to keep them to a minimum. An exhibit book should be delivered to the Court one day before the commencement of trial. Normal and typical customs relating to courtroom decorum apply. For example, counsel should stand when addressing the Court; witness interrogation should be conducted from the lectern; counsel should seek permission from the Court to approach a witness or the bench; witnesses and parties should be addressed by their surname and an appropriate honorific. Chewing gum is prohibited.
Jury Trials
-
Civil Cases
The parties are required to exchange proposed jury instructions before the final pretrial conference, and the attorneys must submit a stipulated set of instructions and proposed voir dire questions at least one week before the commencement of the trial. Boilerplate instructions should not be included. Counsel may contact the case manager for the Court's standard instructions and voir dire questions. The Court gives the jury preliminary instructions before final argument, and after final argument charges the jury with respect to the manner of their deliberations. If the parties are unable to stipulate to all proposed instructions, disagreements will be discussed and resolved by the Court at the charge conference. The joint instructions must be submitted together with a computer disk or flash drive compatible with the current version of Word. All computer media submitted to Court must be certified as virus free.
-
Criminal Cases
Proposed instructions and voir dire questions are to be submitted to Chambers (and not e-filed) in accordance with the deadline set at the final pretrial conference. Standard and boiler-plate instructions and voir dire should not be included. Counsel may contact the case manager for the Court's standard instructions and voir dire questions. Proposed jury instructions must be submitted together with a computer disk or flash drive compatible with the current version of Word. The Court encourages the parties to stipulate that alternate jurors will be identified at the conclusion of the trial at random (by lot). If such a stipulation is reached and made on the record, peremptory challenges normally limited to alternates may be exercised with respect to the entire jury panel. The Court gives the jury preliminary instructions before final argument, and after final argument charges the jury with respect to the manner of their deliberations.
-
All Cases
Documents and photographic exhibits must be published electronically. The parties must prepare two sets of exhibits in hard copy --- one for the Court and one for the jury to reference during deliberations. Attorneys are encouraged to engage a technologically-literate assistant to display the exhibits during trial. All counsel (and their assistants) must contact the Case Manager to arrange for a joint technology tutorial with the Court’s IT representative at lest one week before trial.
In all cases, written copies of the jury instructions are given to the jurors before the jury charge. The Court conducts the initial voir dire , based upon the Court's standard voir dire questions (available in advance from the case manager) supplemented by proposed voir dire questions submitted by the parties. In most cases, the Court will permit parties to conduct voir dire personally by addressing follow-up questions to the jurors that are designed to be probative, and not didactic. Challenges for cause are made on the record in open court, but attorneys may request a side bar conference to interpose a cause challenge. Peremptory challenges are allowed in accordance with Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 24 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 47 (and 28 U.S.C. § 1870), and are exercised by alternating between the parties.
Trial briefs are optional in jury trials. If submitted, they must be exchanged no later than one week before the commencement of the trial. Trial briefs must include a synopsis of the facts, discussion of the controlling law, and discussion of any evidentiary issues likely to arise at trial.
The Court will discuss time limits on opening statements with counsel before trial begins. Keep opening statements brief, for the benefit of the jury. Any exhibits that will be used in opening statements must be shown in advance to opposing counsel.
The Court provides all jurors with a written copy of the final jury instructions so that they may follow along while he reads them and for the jurors' use during deliberations.
The Court requires that all evidentiary stipulations be in writing signed by counsel, and by the defendant in criminal cases, and expects the parties to stipulate to as many undisputed facts as possible. Testimony presented through deposition (video or by transcript) must be purged of objections well in advance of trial. The Court will establish time limitations for closing arguments. The Court limits closing statements to a reasonable amount of time upon which the parties have agreed in advance and that the Judge has approved.
Jurors are permitted to take notes. Jurors are not permitted to ask questions of witnesses.
Non-Jury Trials
Proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law are required to be submitted at least one week before trial. Each fact should be listed in a separate paragraph supported by a citation to an exhibit or a witness's testimony. The parties are required to provide the Court with a copy of proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law on a computer disk or flash drive compatible with the current version of Word.
All of the provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 65 are enforced. The Court rarely grants a temporary restraining order without notice to the opposite party absent a true emergency, such as where the facts alleged establish that giving notice will precipitate the harm that the TRO seeks to prevent. Parties are encouraged to notify the case manager by telephone upon filing a motion for an injunction so that appropriate scheduling issues can be discussed.
Biography:
The Honorable David M. Lawson was nominated to the United States District Court by President William Jefferson Clinton on August 5, 1999, confirmed by a unanimous Senate on May 23, 2000 and began service on August 4, 2000. He graduated magna cum laude from the University of Notre Dame and Wayne State University Law School. After clerkships in the Oakland County Circuit Court (Hon. John N. O'Brien) and the Michigan Supreme Court (Hon. James L. Ryan), he practiced law in small (Lawson & Lawson, P.C.), medium (Lizza, Mulcahy, Casey and Lawson, P.C.) and large (Clark Hill, P.L.C.) law firms in southeastern Michigan for 24 years. His practice areas included criminal defense at both a trial and appellate level; family law; civil tort litigation including medical and legal malpractice, products liability and insurance coverage litigation representing both plaintiffs and defendants; employment litigation; commercial litigation; and transactional work.
Judge Lawson has served as a special assistant attorney general and special prosecutor for the Oakland County one-man grand jury from January 1978 to 1980, and a special prosecutor for Livingston County. He has been a faculty member of the Michigan Judicial Institute since its inception in 1977, and has lectured extensively throughout the country for over 35 years on the subjects of evidence and procedure. He has published several articles on these subjects. He has served as a visiting professor of Evidence and Constitutional Law at Thomas M. Cooley Law School and has served as a lecturer at the University of Detroit Law School, the Institute for Continuing Legal Education (ICLE), the Wayne County Clinical Advocacy Program, and several state and local Bar Association seminars.
Opinions:
25-20030: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RICARDO FONVILLE
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE2/9/2026
24-11229: PAUL SATKOWIAK and PRIZZA SATKOWIAK v. BRIAN MARSHALL and JUSTIN SMITH
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION5/6/2026
25-20165: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MATTHEW WEISS
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S "OMNIBUS" MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT7/6/2026
25-10181: LYNETTE BASON v. VILLAGE SQUARE CONSUMER HOUSING COOPERATIVE and KIRKPATRICK MANAGEMENT COMPANY
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT7/8/2026
23-12113: MAISOON RENICK, personal representative of the Estate of SELENA PEREZ v. DEARBORN HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT #7, AARON MOLLETT, and DR. TYRONE WEEKS
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO DISMISS CERTAIN STATE LAW CLAIMS, AND DISMISSING CASE1/16/2025
24-51057: J. ALEX HALDERMAN v. HERRING NETWORKS, INC., et al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO QUASH OR MODIFY NON-PARTY SUBPOENA1/24/2025
08-13845: ALTER DOMUS, LLC v. LARRY J. WINGET and the LARRY J. WINGET LIVING TRUST
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION TO HOLD DEFENDANT LARRY J. WINGET IN CIVIL CONTEMPT OF COURT2/14/2025
22-md-03040: IN RE: CHRYSLER PACIFICA FIRE RECALL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 3040
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT TESTIMONY OF BRADLEY ZIGLER, EDWARD STOCKTON, DENISE MARTIN, AND ELDON LEAPHART AT THE CLASS CERTIFICATION STAGE2/18/2025
23-10458: ALTER DOMUS, LLC v. LARRY J. WINGET and JVIS-USA, LLC
OPINION AND ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDER COMPELLING PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS AND DISSOLVING STAY2/20/2025
03-80139: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CHRISTOPHER LEE BENSON
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE3/10/2025
18-20198: DENVER LEE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE3/7/2025
19-12328: MARK FRANKLIN HOELTZEL v. MARGIE PILLSBURY et al.
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS, GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE3/10/2025
24-12195: ELG, et al. v. KENNETH KING, et al
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANTS KENNETH KING AND CATHY GREER-FORTE, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART UNIVERSAL PROTECTION SERVICES’S MOTION TO DISMISS5/22/2025
24-51057: J. ALEX HALDERMAN v. HERRING NETWORKS, INC. et al
OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR INDICATIVE RULING5/19/2025
24-11007: KENNETH JAMES WILKINSON v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION6/13/2025
23-10439: RUBICON REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS, LLC, BROWNE DESIGN CONSULTANTS, LLC, and JOSEPH BROWN v. CITY OF PONTIAC and GARLAND S. DOYLE
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT7/2/2025
24-12661: GENERIS ENTERTAINMENT, LLC v. MARY ANNE DONLEY et al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CERTAIN MOTIONS TO DISMISS AMENDED COMPLAINT7/8/2025
23-11339: BRIAN MENGE v. KHURSHEED ASH-SHAFII
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT7/22/2025
24-13195: DIAMOND WILLIAMS v. MASTRONARDI PRODUCE-USA, INC.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE7/31/2025
23-20138: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. QUINTON HOLMES
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EARLY TERMINATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE8/14/2025
08-13845: ALTER DOMUS, LLC v. LARRY J. WINGET and the LARRY J. WINGET LIVING TRUST
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE JUDICIAL SALE AND CONFIRMING JUDICIAL SALE9/9/2025
08-13845: ALTER DOMUS, LLC v. LARRY J. WINGET and the LARRY J. WINGET LIVING TRUST
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ORDER HOLDING DEFENDANT LARRY J. WINGET IN CIVIL CONTEMPT OF COURT9/23/2025
08-13845: ALTER DOMUS, LLC v. LARRY J. WINGET and the LARRY J. WINGET LIVING TRUST
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO VACATE JUDGMENT AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO RENEW JUDGMENT9/25/2025
24-10799: PAUL RIETHMEIER, as guardian of the estate of REX RIETHMEIER, a protected person and MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES v. OAKLAND COUNTY et al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT10/30/2025
92-81127: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GREGORY BROWN
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR BOND11/13/2025
24-11713: VALERIE WALENCIK v. KOSTAL KONTAKT SYSTEME, INC.
ORDER CONDITIONALLY APPROVING RENEWED JOINT MOTION TO APPROVE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT11/14/2025
25-10786: IVORY ELLIS v. LVNV FUNDING, LLC
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS FOR SANCTIONS AND ATTORNEY FEES11/19/2025
25-13630: HECTOR CID-BARRIOS v. KEVIN RAYCRAFT et al.
OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AND TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN12/24/2025
25-11964: BRIAN C. MENGE v. LRIS, LLC; and KHURSHEED ASH-SHAFII
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO STRIKE AMENDED COMPLAINT12/19/2025
12-13710: HRT ENTERPRISES v. CITY OF DETROIT
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND EXPENSES1/16/2024
16-10728: RJ CONTROL CONSULTANTS, INC. and PAUL E. ROGERS v. MULTIJECT, LLC, RSW TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, and JACK ELDER
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES1/16/2024
16-10277: CONCERNED PASTORS FOR SOCIAL ACTION et al. v. NICK A. KHOURI et al.
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CONTEMPT3/12/2024
20-13152: TINA MCPHERSON v. SUBURBAN ANN ARBOR, LLC
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ENHANCED DAMAGES, GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PREJUDGMENT INTEREST, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR IMMEDIATE ENFORCEMENT OF JUDGMENT2/28/2024
22-3040: IN RE: CHRYSLER PACIFICA FIRE RECALL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION2/5/2024
22-11126: APRIL MALICK, ROB MALICK et al. v. CROSWELL-LEXINGTON DISTRICT SCHOOLS, CROSWELL-LEXINGTON BOARD OF EDUCATION, DAN GILBERTSON, and KYLE WOOD
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT2/20/2024
24-10287: CITY OF PONTIAC v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE CITY OF PONTIAC VEBA TRUST
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION2/29/2024
16-20414: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARCUS GILBERT
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE5/15/2024
23-20431: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. SAMER YOUSSEF
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART GOVERNMENT’S MOTION FOR INTERLOCUTORY SALE OF VESSEL SUBJECT TO FORFEITURE AND SETTING SALE CONDITIONS5/17/2024
23-51467: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DONALD STANLEY LAVIGNE and STATE OF MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART GOVERNMENT’S REQUEST FOR A CONTINUING WRIT OF GARNISHMENT5/20/2024
22-3040: IN RE: CHRYSLER PACIFICA FIRE RECALL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
OPINION AND ORDER SUSTAINING DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S DISCOVERY ORDER, VACATING ORDER, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER6/18/2024
23-11585: WILLIAM LEHMAN v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and JULIE A. SU
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, AND REMANDING CASE TO THE DEPARTMENT OF LABOR6/25/2024
23-20275: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TYRESE MARTEZ JONES
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT7/2/2024
22-12021: LAURA BENY v. UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN BOARD OF REGENTS, and MARK M. WEST
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT7/17/2024
21-11494: GREGORY TUCKER v. RANDEE REWERTS
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS8/1/2024
19-20652: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. STEVEN KING
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING GOVERNMENT'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER OF FORFEITURE AND MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT8/19/2024
22-10883: DEON GLENN v. JODI McCLELLAN and TERI MASSEY
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS, GRANTING DEFENDANT McCLELLAN’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, VACATING ORDER OF REFERENCE, AND SETTING STATUS CONFERENCE9/17/2024
23-11666: JAVAN JERRELLE WILSON, SR. v NATHANIEL SMITH et al.
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, SUSTAINING AND OVERRULING CERTAIN OBJECTIONS, DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION, WITHDRAWING REFERENCE, AND SCHEDULING STATUS CONFERENCE9/30/2024
24-20429: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANOTNIO JOHNSON
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS INDICTMENT11/8/2024
24-20083: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TYRESE JOHNSON
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE AND MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT10/29/2024
20-13293: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA
ORDER GRANTING IN PART MONITOR'S MOTION TO ENFORCE CONSENT DECREE AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO CLARIFY CONSENT DECREE12/16/2024
24-20151: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MAHDI HOWARD
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE12/23/2024
21-11297: BROAD-OCEAN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v. BO LEI
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT1/9/2023
21-10080: RYOHEI AKIMA v. CAITLYN M. PECA
CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THE DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT1/20/2023
18-20495: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IBRAHEEM IZZY MUSAIBLI
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR MISTRIAL1/30/2023
20-12521: ENERGY MICHIGAN, INC., and ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESSES ADVOCATING TARIFF EQUITY v. DANIEL C. SCRIPPS et al.
OPINION AFTER TRIAL2/24/2023
16-10277: CONCERNED PASTORS FOR SOCIAL ACTION et al. v. NICK A. KHOURI et al.
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' FIFTH MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT2/24/2023
19-11044: DENNIS SPEERLY et al. v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS ACTION, CERTIFYING SUBCLASSES, AND SETTING DEADLINES FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED NOTICE3/20/2023
15-20743: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DUANE LETROY BERRY
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE CERTIFICATE OF MENTAL DISEASE OR DEFECT AND DANGEROUSNESS6/30/2023
20-10323: OPERATING ENGINEERS' LOCAL 324 FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS AND TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS' LOCAL 324 FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS V. RIETH-RILEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE7/6/2023
22-10947: FRANKLIN CAPITAL FUNDING, LLC v. AUSTIN BUSINESS FINANCE, LLC, and MXT SOLUTIONS, LLC
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS6/7/2023
06-14891: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. DELPHI CORPORATION et. al
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ESTABLISH A FAIR FUND, TURN OVER ASSETS, AND APPOINT A DISTRIBUTION AGENT AND TAX ADMINISTRATOR, AND ESTABLISHING A DEADLINE FOR SUBMITTING A PROPOSED PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION8/1/2023
16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION (MDL No. 2744)
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT AND DENING MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS8/3/2023
21-12099: THE CUSTARD HUT FRANCHISE LLC V. H & J JAWAD LLC D/B/A THE CUSTARD COMPANY et al.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO AMEND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES10/11/2023
20-13124: DOMINIQUE RAMSEY and TRAVIS SAMMONS v. DAVID RIVARD et al.
OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT WITNESSES9/26/2023
22-md-03040: IN RE: CHRYSLER PACIFICA FIRE RECALL PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 3040
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS CONSOLIDATED MASTER COMPLAINT12/11/2023
23-10408: COAST-TO-COAST PRODUCE, LLC et al. v. LAKESIDE PRODUCE USA, INC. et al.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE, AND DISSOLVING STAY OF DISCOVERY12/29/2023
20-13124: DOMINIQUE RAMSEY and TRAVIS SAMMONS v. DAVID RIVARD, DOUGLAS GOUGH, MARK J. GAERTNER, and COUNTY OF SAGINAW
OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE EXPERT WITNESSES9/26/2023
21-12099: THE CUSTARD HUT FRANCHISE LLC v. H & J JAWAD LLC d/b/a THE CUSTARD COMPANY, THE CUSTARD COMPANY — AMOCO LLC, and THE CUSTARD COMPANY — HEIGHTS LLC
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO AMEND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES10/11/2023
23-10408: COAST-TO-COAST PRODUCE, LLC, FRESH ALLIANCE, LLC, and GLOBALMEX INTERNATIONAL, INC. v. LAKESIDE PRODUCE USA, INC. et al.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE, AND DISSOLVING STAY OF DISCOVERY12/29/2023
16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION MDL No. 2744
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION STYLED AS MOTION TO DECERTIFY ISSUE CLASSES1/4/2022
17-10657: PATTI JO CAHOO, et al.v. FAST ENTERPRISES LLC., et al
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION1/18/2022
20-12521: ENERGY MICHIGAN, INC., et al v. DANIEL C. SCRIPPS, et al
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT2/23/2022
16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION MDL No. 2744
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT3/31/2022
16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION MDL No. 2744
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF PLAINTIFF’S EXPERT CRAIG ROSENBERG4/4/2022
16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION MDL No. 2744
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT4/5/2022
16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION MDL No. 2744
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO SEAL AND GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT4/13/2022
21-10790: GREEN GENIE, INC. and ALVIN ALOSACHI v. CITY OF DETROIT, et al
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT4/18/2022
19-11044: WESLEY WON et al. v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SEAL AND UNSEALING DOCUMENTS7/27/2022
19-11044: WESLEY WON, et al. v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
OPINION AND ORDER ON VARIOUS MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY7/27/2022
20-20538: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MATTHEW DARREL CHILDERS
ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO WITHDRAW AND REFERRING THE CASE TO THE FEDERAL COMMUNITY DEFENDER FOR APPOINTMENT OF REPLACEMENT COUNSEL8/12/2022
21-10792: LILIANA SEKULOVSKI v. CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF COMMERCE and JAY JAMES
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT8/1/2022
21-11635: DERRICK CROSBY and ERIC LEWIS v. HEIDI E. WASHINGTON, GARY MINIARD, and GEORGE STEPHENSON
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS AND DENYING MOTIONS TO STAY DISCOVERY AND ENLARGE THE DISCOVERY PERIOD7/13/2022
16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION MDL No. 2744
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S SECOND MOTION TO DECERTIFY CLASS AND PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO SUBMIT TWO ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS TO THE JURY, AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CLARIFY A PREVIOUS EVIDENTIARY RULING9/12/2022
92-81127: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. EDWARD DALE et al.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO VACATE SENTENCES UNDER 28 U.S.C. § 2255, GRANTING IN PART MOTIONS BY DEFENDANTS DALE, GORDON, AND POLK TO REDUCE SENTENCES UNDER THE FAIR SENTENCING ACT, GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT BROWN'S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, AND DENYING VARIOUS PROCEDURAL MOTIONS7/20/2022
18-20495: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IBRAHEEM IZZY MUSAIBLI
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE X-RAY SCANS AND MRI AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ADMIT CERTAIN STATEMENTS OF UNAVAILABLE WITNESSES12/21/2022
21-12740: CHARLES L. GARAVAGLIA and MARY ANN GARAVAGLIA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE12/29/2022
07-20189: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT McDONEL
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE1/13/2021
09-20129: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v TOMMY JACKSON
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE1/25/2021
19-12624: 7-ELEVEN, INC., v CJ-GRAND, LLC and ROBERT TAYLOR
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT2/8/2021
20-10323: OPERATING ENGINEERS’ LOCAL 324 FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS and TRUSTEES OF THE OPERATING ENGINEERS’ LOCAL 324 FRINGE BENEFIT FUNDS v. RIETH-RILEY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.,
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AND DISMISSING OTHER PENDING MOTIONS2/4/2021
19-13374: RIC-MAN CONSTRUCTION, INC. v. PIONEER SPECIAL RISK INSURANCE SERVICES, INC. d/b/a PIONEER UNDERWRITERS
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT2/26/2021
19-20840: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ASHLEY TOWNSEND
CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION TO ACCEPT PLEA AGREEMENT3/1/2021
12-13710: HRT ENTERPRISES v. CITY OF DETROIT
CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO CERTIFY THE CASE FOR INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL3/10/2021
17-10657: PATTI JO CAHOO, et al v. FAST ENTERPRISES, LLC., et al
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT3/25/2021
20-11071: MARINA TOMA v. REBECCA ADDUCCI et al.
OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS4/23/2021
03-10291: A.B. CERNELLE v. GRAMINEX, L.L.C. and CYNTHIA MAY
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT, GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND EXPENSES, AND GRANTING MOTION TO DEEM ATTORNEY FEE MOTION A FINAL ORDER5/12/2021
17-10657: PATTI JO CAHOO, et. al v. FAST ENTERPRISES LLC, et. al
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO INTERVENE5/4/2021
08-13845: ALTER DOMUS, LLC v. LARRY J. WINGET and the LARRY J. WINGET LIVING TRUST
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 54(b), DENYING MOTION TO HOLD DEFENDANTS IN CONTEMPT, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO FILE SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND STRIKING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT FILED UNDER SEAL6/1/2021
16-12799: REBECCA FRISKE v. BONNIER CORPORATION
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR APPROVAL OF ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES6/15/2021
20-12521: ENERGY MICHIGAN, INC., and ASSOCIATION OF BUSINESSES ADVOCATING TARIFF EQUITY v. DANIEL C. SCRIPPS, et al
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS7/15/2021
20-10918: LAKEISHA HARDY v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
OPINION AND ORDER REJECTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND REMANDING CASE FOR FURTHER CONSIDERATON8/13/2021
21-10737: MARK TRZECIAK and JULIE TRZECIAK v. ALLSTATE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS10/29/2021
20-20476: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTONIO DORAN CHANDLER
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE11/10/2021
21-10255: ANDREW HESS v. POSITIVE ENERGY FLEET, LLC.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO COMPEL ARBITRATION11/18/2021
18-20495: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IBRAHEEM IZZY MUSAIBLI
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO ADMIT CERTAIN DOCUMENTS ATTRIBUTED TO THE ISLAMIC STATE OF IRAQ AND AL-SHAM12/28/2021
18-20495: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IBRAHEEM IZZY MUSAIBLI
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS CUSTODIAL STATEMENTS AND ELECTRONIC MESSAGES12/13/2021
18-20495: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. IBRAHEEM IZZY MUSAIBLI
ORDER ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES REGARDING POTENTIAL ATTORNEY CONFLICT OF INTEREST12/7/2021
21-20432: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. LASAIL HAMILTON
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART GOVERNMENT’S MOTION IN LIMINE12/2/2021
20-13293: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. INTERNATIONAL UNION, UNITED AUTOMOBILE, AEROSPACE, AND AGRICULTURAL IMPLEMENT WORKERS OF AMERICA
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION BY JAMES R. COAKLEY FOR APPEAL OF AN INTERPRETIVE RULING OF THE DEFENDANT’S CONSTITUTION7/1/2021
03-10291: A.B. CERNELLE v. GRAMINEX, L.L.C. AND CYNTHIA MAY
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO ENFORCE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND FOR CONTEMPT, IMPOSING REMEDIES, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO MODIFY INJUNCTION2/4/2020
19-10175: ESTATE OF MARGARET A. FLUEGGE and SAFEVEST OAKLAND ACQUISITION, LLC. v. CITY OF WAYNE
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO FILE RESPONSE TO SUR-REPLY, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, AND DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE3/2/2020
19-10662: OAK POINT PARTNERS, LLC. v BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS3/17/2020
18-12973: DAVID EDWARD SHAW v. CITY OF FERNDALE, et al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY FERNDALE DEFENDANTS, DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY MARACLE DEFENDANTS, AND DENYING JOINT MOTION TO ADJOURN SCHEDULING ORDER DATES3/20/2020
18-13727: GRAMINEX, L.L.C. v. AKTIEBOLAGET CERNELLE aka A.B. CERNELLE COMPANY
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE3/31/2020
18-13883: CHRISTOPHER LEE CHERRY v. AMERICAN COUNTRY INSURANCE COMPANY
AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING MOTION TO STAY3/27/2020
20-10699: OLIVER NISSAN AWSHANA, et al. v. REBECCA ADDUCCI, et al.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS4/9/2020
19-11138: KHALED ABDO AHMED, and 85 OTHER PERSONS v. STEPHEN MILLER, DONALD J. TRUMP, et al
SECOND ORDER DISMISSING WITHOUT PREJUDICE CLAIMS OF CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS4/7/2020
19-13153: BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD and BLUE CROSS NETWORK OF MICHIGAN v ENDO PHARAMACEUTICALS, TEIKOKU PHARMA USA, INC., et al
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO REMAND4/14/2020
19-13577: PEGGY LYNN TORPEY, TIMOTHY J. MILLER, Chapter 7 Trustee v. PHILIP SANDELL
OPINION4/30/2020
05-80955: UNITED STATES of AMERICA v. DEMETRIOUS FLENORY
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE MOTION FOR RESENTECING, RELEASE, OR RECOMMENDATION5/5/2020
19-13638: PUBLIC INTEREST LEGAL FOUNDATION, INC. v JANICE M. WINFREY and GEORGE AZZOUZ
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF DETROIT AND MICHIGAN TO INTERVENE AS PARTIES DEFENDANTS5/28/2020
19-10485: MICHIGAN MOTOR TECHNOLOGIES LLC v. VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT and VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF AMERICA, INC.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT'S MOTION TO DISMISS, QUASHING SERVICE OF PROCESS, AND ORDERING PROPER SERVICE7/10/2020
17-20467: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ZAHIR SHAH
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE8/4/2020
14-20542: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. CYNTHIA LONDON-CLAYTON
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO MODIFY RESTITUTION ORDER9/16/2020
19-12755: REGINA CROCHERON v STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY CO.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE PARTY AND SUBSTITUTING PARTY PLAINTIFF9/22/2020
07-20222: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RODOLFO MORENO
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE11/12/2020
17-11356: LEONARD WARE v. SHAWN BREWER
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AMENDED PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS11/23/2020
19-11044: RICHARD FRANCIS, WESLEY WON, DENNIS SPEERLY, et al v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS11/30/2020
18-20183: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TERRELL WHITE
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR COMPASSIONATE RELEASE12/9/2020
17-10657: PATTI JO CAHOO, et al v. FAST ENTERPRISES, LLC., et al
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS BY FAST ENTERPRISES LLC AND CSG GOVERNMENT SOLUTIONS TO DISMISS FOR WANT OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION12/21/2020
17-10657: PATTI JO CAHOO, et al v. FAST ENTERPRISES LLC., et al
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS12/22/2020
18-20633: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v DELMAL LAMAR MYERS
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE1/23/2019
16-10655: CHRISTOPHER DIBBLE v. PAUL KLEE
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS2/4/2019
18-10464: KEVIN SYLVESTER v FCCI INSURANCE COMPANY
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT1/24/2019
18-10165: MS RENTALS, LLC, and GARNER PROPERTIES & MANAGEMENT, LLC vs. CITY OF DETROIT
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING PLAINITFFS PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT UNDER Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(f)(1), DISMISSING CERTAIN COUNTS OF THE COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE, AND DISMISSING MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION AS MOOT2/27/2019
17-12468: DARREN SENSAT v. SOUTHWEST AIRLINES CO.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT3/4/2019
11-20594: GERALD LEE DUVAL and JEREMY DUVAL vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE AND MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE3/30/2019
18-10187: JOSEPH A. FORTIN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING IN PART AND REJECTING IN PART MAGISTRATE JUDGE=S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING PLAINTIFF=S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANT=S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER, AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT3/29/2019
17-10657: PATTI JO CAHOO et al. v. SAS INSTITUTE INC, et al.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA AND ORDERING COMPLIANCE4/23/2019
16-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION MDL No. 2744
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO SEAL CERTAIN DOCUMENTS5/1/2019
17-13062: DAVONTAE SANFORD v. MICHAEL RUSSELL and JAMES TOLBERT
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE VARIOUS DEFENSE EXPERT WITNESSES5/9/2019
17-13062: DAVONTAE SANFORD v. MICHAEL RUSSELL and JAMES TOLBERT
CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT5/15/2019
17-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION MDL No. 2744
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF BRUCE STROMBOM, AND DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE TESTIMONY OF JUSTINE HASTINGS AND CRAIG ROSENBERG5/22/2019
18-10887: JAMES LEE SALTMARSHALL v PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES, et.al
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANTS PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES – GARDEN CITY, LLC, SHAWNA WRIGHT, CHRISTIAN BAUERFELD, JONATHAN MUNSON, JEFFREY TWARDZIK, JEFFREY SMITH AND THE CITY OF INKSTER, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYNG IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANTS VHS CHILDREN’S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN, INC., AND SCOTT LANGENBERG7/11/2019
18-13359: LESLIE D. NOLAN v DETROIT EDISON COMPANY, et.al
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT7/9/2019
18-12792: CHRISTOPHER OGDEN v. LITTLE CAESAR ENTERPRISES, INC. and LC TRADEMARKS, INC.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE7/29/2019
18-10887: JAMES LEE SALTMARSHALL v. VHS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF MICHIGAN, INC. and SCOTT LANGENBERG
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, VACATING IN PART OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND DISMISSING MOTIONS IN LIMINE AS MOOT8/22/2019
16-13174: JOHN DOE v. DAVID H. BAUM, et al
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS, PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INTERIM RELIEF, AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR INTERIM ATTORNEY’S FEES9/30/2019
18-11546: DANIEL J. O'BRIEN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AFFIRMING THE FINDINGS OF THE COMMISSIONER, AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT10/15/2019
01-20057: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. DRAMOND D. HICKS
Corrected Opinion and Order Granting Motion for Resentencing12/11/2019
16-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS ACTION, CERTIFYING ISSUE CLASSES, AND SETTING DEADLINES FOR SUBMISSION OF PROPOSED NOTICE12/9/2019
16-11546: SHAUNA M. MOTE, et al. v. CITY OF CHELSEA, et al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANT WASHTENAW COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION, DENYING MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION BY DEFENDANT MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANT CITY OF CHELSEA, AND ORDERING STATUS CONFERENCE1/2/2018
14-14792: JEFFREY DURK CARTER v. PAUL KLEE
OPINION AND ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS2/5/2018
13-20633: ANTONIO WALKER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO REDUCE SENTENCE AND DENYING MOTIONS TO EXPAND THE RECORD AND FOR OTHER RELIEF2/14/2018
17-10657: PATTI JO CAHOO, et al. v. SAS INSTITUTE INC., et al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND SCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE3/2/2018
17-11259: SOUTHFIELD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, et al. v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SOUTHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS and SOUTHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS3/27/2018
16-14406: EARL CROSBY, et al. v. TWITTER, INC., et al.
CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE3/30/2018
11-11100: JOHN HENRY RAY v CATHERINE S. BAUMAN
OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (AFTER REMAND)4/13/2018
17-11085: RAFAEL LINARES v. WARDEN J.A. TERRIS
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS4/9/2018
18-50368: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ROBERT A. GROSS
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING ALEC LANG’S MOTION FOR RECOGNITION AS CRIME VICTIM4/17/2018
17-11259: SOUTHFIELD EDUCATION ASSOCIATION, et al., v. BOARD OF EDUCATION OF THE SOUTHFIELD PUBLIC SCHOOLS et al.
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION, STAY, AND CERTIFICATION6/11/2018
17-10921: BRENTS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND REVERSING AND REMANDING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS7/17/2018
16-12799: FRISKE v. BONNIER CORPORATION
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS SETTLEMENT7/26/2018
17-11044: OAKES v. KAREN WEAVER and CITY OF FLINT
CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE7/30/2018
16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS9/12/2018
15-14367: HARRY BENION, et al. v. LECOM, INCORPORATED, et al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT LECOM COMMUNICATIONS, GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY DEFENDANT LECOM, INC., DENYING MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PLAINTIFFS AND BY DEFENDANTS LECOM COMMUNICATIONS, JOSEPH LENTINE, AND JEFFREY GENDRON AND BY PLAINITFFS, AND DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT AGAINST DEFENDANT LECOM, INC. ONLY9/30/2018
17-12475: DAVIS v. ECHO VALLEY CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, CASA BELLA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC., and WANDA RULE
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO EXCLUDE MARK CLOR'S TESTIMONY, DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DISMISSING CERTAIN DISCOVERY MOTIONS, AND DISMISSING THE AMENDED COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE11/7/2018
17-12320: SUSAN WHITE, et al v. FCA US, LLC and CLARENCE HEATH
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT11/19/2018
16-2744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART SECOND MOTION TO DISMISS ALLEGING FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM11/28/2018
17-13062: DAVONTAE SANFORD v. CITY OF DETROIT, MICHAEL RUSSELL, and JAMES TOLBERT
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS12/4/2018
17-13909: HENKEL OF AMERICA, INC. v. CRAIG M. BELL and KNIGHT CAPITAL PARTNERS CORP.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT12/17/2018
17-12214: OMAR BATSON v. GENESEE COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPUTY HOOVER et al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT12/21/2018
16-13174: JOHN DOE v. DAVID H. BAUM et al.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION AND RENEWED MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MOTIONS FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING, AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS1/12/2017
16-10277: CONCERNED PASTORS FOR SOCIAL ACTION, et al. v. NICK A. KHOURI, et al.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION BY ATTORNEY GENERAL BILL SCHUETTE TO FILE AMICUS CURIAE BRIEF1/23/2017
16-11605: THOMAS MITCHELL, et. al v. COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH OF CENTRAL MICHIGAN, et al
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AND MOTIONS TO DISMISS3/22/2017
15-12637: EDWARD BURLEY v. PATRICK MILLER, et al
OPINION AND ORDER REJECTING IN PART REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, SUSTAINING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S OBJECTIONS, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND PARTIES, AND CONTINUING ORDER OF REFERENCE3/13/2017
14-14376: TIM TREVINO v. JANE KELLY, et al
OPINION AND ORDER REJECTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANT CASTLEBERRY, DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANT PIFER, GRANTING DEFENDANT RINEY’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND PARTIES, AND CONTINUING ORDER OF REFERENCE3/27/2017
16-14048: IN RE: PATRICK GEORGE, Debtor / SELWAN KESTO, Appellant v. PATRICK GEORGE, Appellee
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS APPEAL4/11/2017
16-md-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION4/19/2017
16-11546: SHAUNA M. MOTE, et al. v. CITY OF CHELSEA, et al.
CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO AMEND THE COMPLAINT AND JOINT MOTION TO APPROVE THE CONSENT DECREE5/19/2017
16-11380: SCOTTIE GIBSON and LOREN JUSI v. DEPUTY T. O'DONNELL
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT5/23/2017
16-12022: KNIGHT CAPITAL PARTNERS CORP. v. HENKEL AG & COMPANY, KGAA
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS6/23/2017
15-12838: BRIAN J. MARTIN, YAHMI NUNDLEY, and KATHLEEN CADEAU v. TROTT LAW, P.C. and DAVID A. TROTT
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR TO STRIKE CERTAIN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES, AND DENYING DEFENDANT DAVID TROTT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT7/14/2017
16-12652: BIG CITY SMALL WORLD BAKERY CAFÉ, LLC v. FRANCIS DAVID CORPORATION d/b/a ELECTRONIC MERCHANT SYSTEMS
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR COMPEL ARBITRATION7/14/2017
16-13085: ATLAS TECHNOLOGIES, LLC v JESSE LEVINE, et al
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS7/26/2017
16-13088: PRODUCTIVITY TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION v JESSE LEVINE, et al
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS7/26/2017
16-10885: JESA ENTERPRISES LTD v THERMOFLEX CORPORATION v SILAGY MURDOCH GROUP, INC, et al
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO STRIKE TESTIMONY OF PROPOSED EXPERT WITNESSES7/28/2017
16-20839: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BRAINT N. HALL
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT I OF THE SUPERSEDING INDICTMENT OR FOR A BILL OF PARTICULARS8/9/2017
17-10369: JASON C. THOMPKE and MELISSA J. THOMPKE v. FABRIZIO & BROOK, P.C.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS8/14/2017
05-10036: CURTIS PARKS v MILLICENT WARREN
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS (AFTER REMAND)9/28/2017
16-13174: JOHN DOE v. DAVID H. BAUM, SUSAN PRITZEL, et al
CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MISCELLANEOUS RELIEF AND DENYING MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND THE JUDGMENT AND FOR LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED COMPLAINT10/3/2017
16-10782: JAMES BRIDGEWATER v MICHIGAN GAMING CONTROL BOARD
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESCHEDULING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE10/10/2017
17-12107: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY v. CITY OF FLINT and FLINT CITY COUNCIL
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT10/23/2017
17-12107: MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY v. CITY OF FLINT and FLINT CITY COUNCIL
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING INTERVENING DEFENDANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION, TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT, FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT, AND FOR STAY OF PROCEEDINGS10/27/2017
16-02744: IN RE: FCA US LLC MONOSTABLE ELECTRONIC GEARSHIFT LITIGATION
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS ALLEGING FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM11/15/2017
17-12320: SUSAN WHITE, et al v FCA US, LLC and CLARENCE HEATH
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REMAND AND MOTION TO DISMISS11/16/2017
17-20135: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. FRANK BALLY
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS INDICTMENT AND SCHEDULING EVIDENTIARY HEARING11/22/2017
16-12022: KNIGHT CAPITAL PARTNERS CORP. v. HENKEL AG & COMPANY, KGaA
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY, GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS BY DEFENDANT AND NON-PARTY HENKEL CORPORATION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDERS, DENYING HENKEL CORPORATION'S MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENA, AND GRANTING RELIEF FROM SCHEDULING ORDER11/30/2017
16-12342: YARMOUTH COMMONS ASSOCIATION v. PAMELA NORWOOD and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, et al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT12/8/2017
17-11169: MICHAEL MATTIA v. CITY OF CENTER LINE, MICHIGAN. et al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION12/18/2017
14-10713: DAVID HUNT and CAROL SANTANGELO v. DONNELLY HADDEN, and DONNELLY W. HADDEN, P.C.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEY’S FEES2/4/2016
15-11512: MICHIGAN FLYER, LLC and INDIAN TRAILS, INC. v. WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT AND FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT2/22/2016
15-10525: TANGANEKA L. PHILLIPS v. UAW INTERNATIONAL, et al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT3/4/2016
15-11727: ROBERT ANDERSON v. KEVIN ALLEN JUTZY, M.D., et al.
ORDER ADOPTING IN PART MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTIONS IN PART, AND GRANTING DEFENDANT VATRINO'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT3/31/2016
15-12101: DANIEL WHALEY v. HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION AS COLLECTIVE ACTION, AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE3/31/2016
16-10254: NISAR NAJMUDDIN MULLA v REBECCA ADDUCCI, et al.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS4/14/2016
15-13708: LITTLE RIVER BAND OF OTTAWA INDIANS and its EMPLOYEE WELFARE PLAN v. BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS4/29/2016
15-13543: COSME CRUZ and SHIRLEANN CRUZ v. CAPITAL ONE, N.A.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE6/28/2016
16-11249: MAGNA POWERTRAIN DE MEXICO S.A. DE C.V. v. MOMENTIVE PERFORMANCE MATERIALS USA LLC
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS OR TRANSFER, AND TRANSFERRING CASE TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK6/16/2016
15-10466: KATIE REDMOND, Personal Representative of the Estate of Herbert Redmond, deceased v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTIONS TO PROHIBIT PLAINTIFF'S PROPOSED EXPERT WITNESSES FROM TESTIFYING AND FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT7/15/2016
16-10277: CONCERNED PASTORS FOR SOCIAL ACTION et al. v. NICK A. KHOURI et al.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTIONS TO DISMISS7/15/2016
15-14276: IN RE: RENEE D. NEWELL, Debtor / WAYNE COUNTY, Appellant v. RENEE D. NEWELL, Appellee
OPINION7/27/2016
15-12838: BRIAN J. MARTIN and YAHMI NUNDLEY v. TROTT LAW, P.C., et al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS, GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND ORDERING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE7/27/2016
15-11276: MICHAEL MUNGER v. FIRST NATIONAL COLLECTION BUREAU, INC., and RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART PETITIONS FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES7/27/2016
07-20265: THOMAS VANBUHLER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE8/4/2016
16-10128: JONATHAN GAFFERS v. KELLY SERVICES, INC.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION OF COLLECTIVE ACTION AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' RENEWED MOTION TO STAY AND COMPEL ARBITRATION8/25/2016
15-20112: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. RONNELL LEESHAWN MARTIN
ORDER SUSTAINING IN PART AND OVERRULING IN PART DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO PRESENTENCE REPORT8/30/2016
15-13567: DONNA ROSE and PAUL PALMER v. WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION OF DENIAL OF TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER, LEAVE TO AMEND COMPLAINT, AND INTERVENTION, AND DISMISSING CASE AS MOOT9/29/2016
16-13233: QUICKEN LOANS, INC. v. RE/MAX, LLC.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE10/31/2016
16-10277: CONCERNED PASTORS FOR SOCIAL ACTION, et. al, v. NICK A. KHOURI, et. al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION11/17/2016
16-12866: 679637 ONTARIO LTD. v. ALPINE SIGN & PRINTER SUPPLY, INC. and MARABU NORTH AMERICA, L.P.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT ALPINE'S MOTION TO DISMISS11/23/2016
16-10277: CONCERNED PASTORS FOR SOCIAL ACTION, et al., v. NICK A. KHOURI, et al.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO STAY PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION12/8/2016
15-13262: KEENAN VERNER v. CITY OF SOUTHGATE et al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DISMISSING CERTAIN CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS, AND SCHEDULING TRIAL ON DAMAGES12/15/2016
14-12397: PRIME RATE PREMIUM FINANCE CORPORATION v. KEITH A. LARSON et al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT BRANDON LARSON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT12/27/2016
13-13761: CHARLES SHEHEE v. SAGINAW COUNTY and PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INC.,
Opinion and Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Dismissing Amended Complaint1/8/2015
13-13938: ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY f/k/a Royal Indemnity Company v. THE CITY OF WARREN, MICHIGAN, et. al
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO DISMISS, DISMISSING REMAINING CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE, DISMISSING PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS AS MOOT, AND CLOSING CASE1/8/2015
11-14422: K. JIN LIM as TRUSTEE OF MP LIQUIDATING CO. LLC v. MILLER PARKING CO., et. al
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SETOFF AND FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S AND DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO STRIKE OR LIMIT EXPERT TESTIMONY1/15/2015
13-12151: DYKEMA EXCAVATORS, INC, et. al v. BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT1/22/2015
14-10527: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v.GOYETTE MECHANICAL COMPANY, INC., et. al
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING MOTION BY PS DESIGN SYSTEMS, LLC, CARLA JACKSON-STOVALL AND ISAIAH STOVALL TO DISMISS THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT, AND PERMITTING THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFFS TO FILE AN AMENDED THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT2/13/2015
14-20117: United States of America v. Xavier Giovanni Deleon
Opinion and Order Denying Motion to Suppress Evidence2/3/2015
11-14603: Tad Dewulf v. Kenneth McKee
Opinion and Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus3/24/2015
10-13762: SAMANTHA BACHYNSKI v. MILLICENT WARREN
OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS4/2/2015
11-12771: STEPHEN C. GRANT v. KENNETH T. McKEE
ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, OVERRULING PETITIONER’S OBJECTIONS, AND DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS4/2/2015
13-14218: JOHN ARMSTRONG v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING IN PART MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AFFIRMING DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER, DISMISSING COMPLAINT, AND REFERRING ATTORNEY RICHARD J. DOUD TO THE CHIEF JUDGE FOR POSSIBLE DISCIPLINE4/2/2015
04-20009: TERRY E. CALLINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE, MOTION TO APPOINT COUNSEL, AND MOTION FOR AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING5/15/2015
13-14299: GEO FINANCE, LLC. v. UNIVERSITY SQUARE 2751, LLC.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S AND DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT5/15/2015
14-12250: Groff v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage Inc.
Opinion and Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Dismissing Case with Prejudice5/8/2015
15-10475: Peguese v. PNC Bank NA and Dominic Goyette
Opinion and Order Dismissing Case for Want of Jurisdiction5/6/2015
13-13804: BOWLERS' ALLEY, INC. v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT6/5/2015
03-20008: JAMES ROY SYLVESTER, JR., v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE SENTENCE6/22/2015
14-10713: DAVID HUNT and CAROL SANTANGELO v. DONNELLY HADDEN and DONNELLY W. HADDEN, P.C.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT, AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MOTION IN LIMINE6/29/2015
14-14430: CH HOLDING COMPANY and CH/BRAND PARKING ASSOCIATES v. MILLER PARKING COMPANY, et. al.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND6/29/2015
14-12715: JANICE ZELLERINO v. ANDREW ROOSEN, and SALEM SHUBASH d/b/a ARMORED INVESTMENT GROUP
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS, DISMISSING DISCOVERY MOTIONS AS MOOT, AND DISMISSING COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE7/31/2015
14-14832: IN RE: MILLER PARKING COMPANY, LLC. v. BASIL T. SIMON, Bankruptcy Trustee of the Bruce H. Miller Bankruptcy Estate, et. al
OPINION7/31/2015
15-10747: EARL D. WILSON v. TROTT LAW, P.C.,
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS OR FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT7/31/2015
13-13804: BOWLERS' ALLEY, INC. v. THE CINCINNATI INSURANCE COMPANY
OPINION AND ORDER ON DAMAGES ISSUES8/13/2015
15-10780: PAMELA CARPENTER v. MONROE FINANCIAL RECOVERY GROUP, LLC., et.al
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO AMEND COUNT I OF THE COMPLAINT, AND GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTS II AND III OF THE COMPLAINT8/13/2015
14-14668: Ingenium Technologies Corp V. Beaver Aerospace & Defense, Inc
Opinion And Order Conditionally Granting Defendant’s Motion To Dismiss For Forum Non Conveniens8/18/2015
14-10713: DAVID HUNT and CAROL SANTANGELO v. DONNELLY HADDEN and DONNELLY W. HADDEN, P.C.
SUPPLEMENTAL OPINION ON CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT9/8/2015
14-12214: K.S. v. DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS, et al
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT CHARLES PUGH’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DENYING DPS DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT9/17/2015
15-12471: JONATHAN MCCORMACK v. SCOTTSDALE INSURANCE COMPANY
OPINION AND ORDER REMANDING CASE TO STATE COURT9/17/2015
15-11512: MICHIGAN FLYER, LLC and INDIAN TRAILS, INC., v. WAYNE COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS AND DISMISSING CERTAIN OTHER MOTIONS AS MOOT10/14/2015
14-10527: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION v. GOYETTE MECHANICAL COMPANY, INC., et al.
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION BY E.L. MECHANICAL, INC. TO AMEND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND GRANTING PNC BANK’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT10/23/2015
12-14874: LONDONE LEE SYKES, JR. v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES11/19/2015
15-12470: MICHIGAN PROTECTION & ADVOCACY SERVICE, INC., V. FLINT COMMUNITY SCHOOLS AND LARRY WATKINS, JR.
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION11/25/2015
14-14172: YOLANDA LARRY v. THERESA POWERSKI
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT12/10/2015
13-50987: In Re Grand Jury Subpoena (John Doe, Inc.)
Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Movant's Motion to Quash Grand aJury Subpoena1/15/2014
13-13804: Bowlers' Alley, Inc v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Opinion and Order Denying Defendant's Motion to Dismiss7/18/2014
13-11462: Thad Tikkanenv. Liberty Life Assurance Company of Boston
Opinion and Order Granting Defendant's Motion to Affirm Plan Administrator's Decision, Denying Plaintiff's Motion to Reverse Plan Administrator's Decision, and Dismissing Complaint with Prejudice7/18/2014
13-11436: Malibu Media, LLC. v. Kurt Schelling
Opinion and Order Granting in Part Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment7/18/2014
07-11141: Michael Louis Cristini v. City of Warren, et. al
Opinion and Order on Motions to Determine Attorney's Lien7/14/2014
14-10299: Atmosphere Hospitality Management Services, LLC v. Royal Realities, LLC., et. al
Opinion and Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Disqualify Counsel, Staying Case, and Authorizing Immediate Appeal7/1/2014
13-20556: USA v. Binder
Opinion and Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal and Dismissing Indictment6/5/2014
13-11977: Kathryn Llewellyn-Jones, et. al v. Metro Property Group, LLC., et. al
Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motions to Strike and Dismiss, and Scheduling Case Management Conference5/29/2014
12-13083: Mike Vaughn Custom Sports, Inc. v. Chrystem "Chris" Piku, et. al
Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss by Defendants Piku and Piku Management Company4/29/2014
14-10527: PNC Bank, National Association v. Goyette Mechanical Company, Inc., et. al
Opinion and Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Receiver, Denying Goyette Defendants' Motion for Contempt, and Vacating Injunction4/29/2014
10-14028: James Holland Jr. v. Steven Rivard
Opinion and Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus4/3/2014
13-11693: Lewis v. Nationstar Mortgage et. al.
Opinion and Order Adopting Reports and Recomendations, Overruling Plaintiff's and Defendant's Objections, Granting Motions to Dismiss and for Judgment on the Pleadings by Defendants Nationstar And Bank of America, Granting in Part Motion for Summary Judgment by defendant Schneiderman & Sherman, and Continuing Reference Order3/18/2014
09-12950: United States Security and Exhange Comission v. John J. Bravata, et. al
Opinion and Order Granting Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment3/13/2014
13-20182: United States of America v. Brent Mckinney
Opinion and Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Judgment of Acquittal3/13/2014
09-14642: Palmer v. Flore, Hensley, et. al
Opinion and Order Adjudicating Affirmative Defense of Exhaustion of Remedies3/3/2014
12-15450: Jac Holding Enterprises, Inc. et. al v. Atrium Capital Partners, LLC., et. al
Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motions to Dismiss, Dismissing Certain Claims, and Scheduling Case Management Converence2/20/2014
13-10627: Jozef Dybek and Irena Dybek v. Fedex Trade Networks Transport & Brokerage, Inc.
Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment2/20/2014
13-13804: Bowler's Alley, Inc., v. The Cincinnati Insurance Company
Opinion and Order Granting in Part Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss Counter-Complaint8/26/2014
13-12803: Ricardo Sherman v. United States of America
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO REINSTATE CASE9/30/2014
13-13350: DEBRA WITHERELL on behalf of M.D.H., a minor v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
OPINION9/30/2014
11-12031: LUVIQ PLUMAJ v. RAYMOND BOOKER
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO AMEND JUDGMENT10/10/2014
14-12078: SHELBY WEIGANDT v. FARM BUREAU GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et. al
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS10/9/2014
13-13938: ARROWOOD INDEMNITY COMPANY fka Royal Indemnity Company v. THE CITY OF WARREN, MICHIGAN, et al
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO RECUSE10/23/2014
12-10038: THERESA BASSETT, et. al v. GOVERNOR RICHARD SNYDER
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING PERMANENT INJUNCTION11/14/2014
14-10076 & 14-11440: STEFANO SPIGNO, ANN. E. BLAAUW v. PRECISION PIPELINE, LLC, and ALAN GANSCH
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS TO AMEND COMPLAINT11/14/2014
13-20423: United States of America v. Jimmie Eugene White II
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION TO SUPPRESS EVIDENCE11/24/2014
14-14335: Powers v. Bank of America, N.A.
Opinion and Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order and for a Preliminary Injunction, and Granting an Equitable Stay of the Plaintiffs' Redemption Period11/26/2014
13-11049: Numatics, Inc. v. Balluff, Inc., and H.H. Barnum Company
OPINION AND ORDER ON PARTIES’ MOTIONS TO EXCLUDE CERTAIN EXPERT WITNESS TESTIMONY12/17/2014
14-13398: UNITED STATES ex rel. WALTER TOEBE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. THE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS12/17/2014
11-12344: 360 CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., v. ATSALIS BROTHERS PAINTING CO.,et. al
Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment1/3/2013
11-12165: Dean S. Hazel v. Brian Quinn
Opinion and Order Rejecting Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, Sustaining Plaintiff's Objections to Report and Recommendation, Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, Vacating Order of Reference,and Scheduling Status Conference3/21/2013
11-11196: FERNANDO DAVIS v. ROBERT J. PICKELL, et. al
Opinion and Order Adopting Report and Recommendations and Granting in Part Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment4/11/2013
12-14300: KHALIL FAREED v. G4S SECURE SOLUTIONS (USA) INC., et. al
Opinion and Order Denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and Directing Plaintiff to File an Amended Complaint5/6/2013
12-10038: Bassett et. al. v. Governor Snyder
Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendatnt's Motion to Dismiss and Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction6/28/2013
12-10328: Schmidt v. City of Dearborn, et. al
Opinion and Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment by All Defendatns Except Nabil Hawily7/31/2013
10-20392: United States of America v. Edward Schneider
Opinion and Order Denying Motion for Judgment of Acquittal on Count 7 of the Third Superseding Indictment8/9/2013
10-20635: USA v. Hector Santana, Et. Al
Opinion and Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motions for Judgment of Acquittal or New Trial8/12/2013
07-10631: Pucci v Somers
Opinion and Order Granting Motion to Quash Writs of Garnishment for Want of Jurisdiction and Denying Motions for Summary Judgment8/16/2013
12-14460: COUNTY OF GENESEE, et al. v. GREENSTONE FARM CREDIT SERVICES, et. al
Opinion and Order Dening Plaintiffs' Motions for Summary judgment, Granting Defendatns' Motion for Summary Judgment, and Dismissing Case9/12/2013
13-12271: LYNELLE HENSON v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Opinion and Order Granting Defendant's Motion to dismiss and Dismissing Complaint with Prejudice10/25/2013
10-20535: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BOBBY W. FERGUSON, et. al
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BOBBY W. FERGUSON, et. al2/16/2012
10-12886: STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY v. JAMES AND RENAY WILSON
STATE OF MICHIGAN, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY v. JAMES AND RENAY WILSON2/16/2012
11-11602: TRUSTEES OF PLASTERS LOCAL 67 PENSION TRUST FUND et. al v. MARTIN MCMAHON PLASTERING, INC.
TRUSTEES OF PLASTERS LOCAL 67 PENSION TRUST FUND et. al v. MARTIN MCMAHON PLASTERING, INC.2/23/2012
11-14512: LARRY R. TALTON and STACIE C. TALTON v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP
LARRY R. TALTON and STACIE C. TALTON v. BAC HOME LOANS SERVICING LP3/15/2012
10-20436: UNITED STATES of AMERICA v. THEODORE COOPER STEWART
UNITED STATES of AMERICA v. THEODORE COOPER STEWART3/15/2012
10-13000: CHILDREN’S LEGAL SERVICES, PLLC, v. SHOR LEVIN AND DERITA, PC
CHILDREN’S LEGAL SERVICES, PLLC, v. SHOR LEVIN AND DERITA, PC3/29/2012
11-20594: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GERALD LEE DUVAL, JR and JEREMY DUVAL
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. GERALD LEE DUVAL, JR and JEREMY DUVAL4/4/2012
08-11564: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $463,497.72 IN U.S. CURRENCY FROM BEST BANK, et. al
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $463,497.72 IN U.S. CURRENCY FROM BEST BANK, et. al4/4/2012
11-12344: 360 CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. ATSALIS BROTHERS PAINTING CO., et. al
360 CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. v. ATSALIS BROTHERS PAINTING CO., et. al4/13/2012
10-20535: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BOBBY W. FERGUSON, et. al
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. BOBBY W. FERGUSON, et. al6/1/2012
07-15152: James Redmond v. James Worthington and Kenneth J. Aud
James Redmond v. James Worthington and Kenneth J. Aud7/23/2012
10-12427: City of Detroit v. State of Michigan and Comcast of Detroit, and Michigan Attorney General
City of Detroit v. State of Michigan and Comcast of Detroit, and Michigan Attorney General7/23/2012
12-20092: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUSSAIN N. ABDULKADIN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. HUSSAIN N. ABDULKADIN7/25/2012
11-15169: MICHAEL J. BAKER and SUZIE C. BAKER v. RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, and ORLANS ASSOCIATES, P.C.,
MICHAEL J. BAKER and SUZIE C. BAKER v. RESIDENTIAL FUNDING COMPANY, LLC, and ORLANS ASSOCIATES, P.C.,8/21/2012
11-15521: KURT D. GREGORY v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., et. al
KURT D. GREGORY v. CITIMORTGAGE, INC., et. al9/12/2012
10-13870: TIANA HOWARD-JOHNSON v. V&S DETROIT GALVANIZING, LLC
TIANA HOWARD-JOHNSON v. V&S DETROIT GALVANIZING, LLC9/27/2012
12-11282: MT. CLEMENS AUTO CENTER INC. v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA
MT. CLEMENS AUTO CENTER INC. v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA10/11/2012
10-20163: United States of America v. Anthony Johnson
United States of America v. Anthony Johnson10/18/2012
11-11930: PATRICIA A. KIENZLE v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC.
PATRICIA A. KIENZLE v. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC.11/1/2012
12-10629: CH Holding Company, et al. v Miller Parking Company, et.al
CH Holding Company, et al. v Miller Parking Company, et.al11/8/2012
11-13985: S.A. RESTAURANTS, INC. v. ANDREW J. DELONEY
S.A. RESTAURANTS, INC. v. ANDREW J. DELONEY12/20/2012
10-13008: ETERNAL PRESERVATION ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff and counter-defendant v. ACCIDENTAL MUMMIES TOURING, Defendant and counter-plaintiff v. WOLF CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC., Third-party defendant.
ETERNAL PRESERVATION ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff and counter-defendant v. ACCIDENTAL MUMMIES TOURING, Defendant and counter-plaintiff v. WOLF CAPITAL PARTNERS, INC., Third-party defendant.1/6/2011
10-12285: THE MASON AND DIXON LINES, INC., UNIVERSAL AM-CAN, LTD., and MASON DIXON INTERMODAL, INC. v. KIRK T. STEUDLE and TED B. WAHBY, et. al
THE MASON AND DIXON LINES, INC., UNIVERSAL AM-CAN, LTD., and MASON DIXON INTERMODAL, INC. v. KIRK T. STEUDLE and TED B. WAHBY, et. al1/20/2011
09-12950: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. JOHN J. BRAVATA, et. al
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. JOHN J. BRAVATA, et. al2/1/2011
09-12950: UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. JOHN J. BRAVATA, et. al
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. JOHN J. BRAVATA, et. al2/1/2011
08-10166: United States of America v. Gordon H. Porath and Georgina M. Porath
United States of America v. Gordon H. Porath and Georgina M. Porath2/17/2011
10-12539: Ralph E. Smith, Jr. v. Michigan Department of Corrections, et. al
Ralph E. Smith, Jr. v. Michigan Department of Corrections, et. al2/24/2011
05-10172: ANTONIO GARCIA-DORANTES v. MILLICENT WARREN
ANTONIO GARCIA-DORANTES v. MILLICENT WARREN3/14/2011
10-12513: HARRY O. LUTZ and PAULA G. LUTZ v. STEWART MICHIGAN TITLE et. al
HARRY O. LUTZ and PAULA G. LUTZ v. STEWART MICHIGAN TITLE et. al3/14/2011
10-12427: City of Detroit v. Comcast of Detroit, Inc., f/k/a Comcast Cablevision of Detroit, Inc.
City of Detroit v. Comcast of Detroit, Inc., f/k/a Comcast Cablevision of Detroit, Inc.3/24/2011
10-14078: Tax Increment Finance Authority and City of Dearborn Heights v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Project Control Systems, Inc.
Tax Increment Finance Authority and City of Dearborn Heights v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company and Project Control Systems, Inc.3/24/2011
10-10099: TODD D. DENNIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
TODD D. DENNIS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY3/31/2011
09-14851: Robert Allen King v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Robert Allen King v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY3/31/2011
08-11564: United States of America v. STACEY HOGAN GIANOPLOS et. al
United States of America v. STACEY HOGAN GIANOPLOS et. al3/31/2011
07-13839: DAVID McCLOY v. CORRECTION MEDICAL SERVICES, et.al
DAVID McCLOY v. CORRECTION MEDICAL SERVICES, et.al4/14/2011
10-14928: Humphres,B.O.C. Law Group, P.C. v. Carroll
Humphres,B.O.C. Law Group, P.C. v. Carroll4/19/2011
11-50051: OCEANFIRST BANK v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
OCEANFIRST BANK v. HARTFORD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY5/5/2011
09-14377: ELIZABETH SANDERS and JUDE BECKOWITZ v. ADRIENNE M. STANLEY, D.O. et. al
ELIZABETH SANDERS and JUDE BECKOWITZ v. ADRIENNE M. STANLEY, D.O. et. al5/20/2011
11-10694: Sleiman v. National Casualty Insurance and Zurich American Insurance
Sleiman v. National Casualty Insurance and Zurich American Insurance6/1/2011
05-72126: Fharmacy Records v. Salaam Nassar,Curtis Jacson,ET AL.
Fharmacy Records v. Salaam Nassar,Curtis Jacson,ET AL.7/18/2011
09-13897: BARBARA L. CORWIN et. al v. LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CO., f.k.a. LANDAMERICA TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE CO.,
BARBARA L. CORWIN et. al v. LAWYERS TITLE INSURANCE CO., f.k.a. LANDAMERICA TRANSNATION TITLE INSURANCE CO.,8/4/2011
09-13621: THELESTER MAHONE v. PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 636 FRINGE BENEFITS FUND
THELESTER MAHONE v. PIPEFITTERS LOCAL 636 FRINGE BENEFITS FUND8/12/2011
10-11923: FREMONT REORGANIZING CORP v. RONNIE DUKE, et.al
FREMONT REORGANIZING CORP v. RONNIE DUKE, et.al9/15/2011
08-13236: Austin v. Redford Township Police Department
Austin v. Redford Township Police Department9/30/2011
10-11676: Murphy v. Lockhart, Birkett, Bowerson, Krajnik, Bearss, Werner, Berry, Bauman and Sherry
Murphy v. Lockhart, Birkett, Bowerson, Krajnik, Bearss, Werner, Berry, Bauman and Sherry9/30/2011
11-10016: First American Title Insurance Company v. Bryan Pazdzierz
First American Title Insurance Company v. Bryan Pazdzierz10/24/2011
11-10513: Bajraszewski v. Allstate Insurance Company
Bajraszewski v. Allstate Insurance Company10/20/2011
04-74514: Laborers Pension Trust Fund-Detroit and Vicinity, et. al. v. Interior Exterior Specialists Company et.al.
Laborers Pension Trust Fund-Detroit and Vicinity, et. al. v. Interior Exterior Specialists Company et.al.11/2/2011
10-14727: CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS OF LLOYDS, LONDON v. US INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, LLC et. al
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS OF LLOYDS, LONDON v. US INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, LLC et. al11/17/2011
10-12526: SALLY HILDEN and JEROME FLYNN v. HURLEY MEDICAL CENTER et. al
SALLY HILDEN and JEROME FLYNN v. HURLEY MEDICAL CENTER et. al12/8/2011
11-14878: Mt. Cleens Auto Center, Inc. v. Hyundai Motor America
Mt. Cleens Auto Center, Inc. v. Hyundai Motor America12/12/2011
07-10631: JULIE A PUCCI v. CHIEF JUDGE MARK W. SOMERS
JULIE A PUCCI v. CHIEF JUDGE MARK W. SOMERS12/22/2011
09-11430: Systematic Recycling v. City of Detroit et al
Systematic Recycling v. City of Detroit et al2/17/2010
08-11842: Lanier v. Metorpolitan Life Insurance Company
Lanier v. Metorpolitan Life Insurance Company3/9/2010
09-12226: Lee v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund
Lee v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund3/15/2010
09-11061: ERNEST DURMISHI v. NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY
ERNEST DURMISHI v. NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY6/30/2010
08-12586: Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund et. al. v. Palladium Equity Partners, LLC et. al
Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund et. al. v. Palladium Equity Partners, LLC et. al7/14/2010
08-12586: Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund, et. al. v. Palladium Equity Partners, LLC, et. al
Board of Trustees, Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund, et. al. v. Palladium Equity Partners, LLC, et. al7/14/2010
09-13396: Kiesgen v. St. Clair Marine Salvage, Inc
Kiesgen v. St. Clair Marine Salvage, Inc7/12/2010
09-11111: Prestige Capital Corp. v. Michigan Gage and Manufacturing, LLC et. Al
Prestige Capital Corp. v. Michigan Gage and Manufacturing, LLC et. Al7/12/2010
05-72126: Fharmacy Records and Shelton Rivers v. Salaam Nassar et al.
Fharmacy Records and Shelton Rivers v. Salaam Nassar et al.7/23/2010
09-14682: Maxine White and James Flanders, III v. Loomis Armored US, Inc.
Maxine White and James Flanders, III v. Loomis Armored US, Inc.7/28/2010
08-13926: GEORGE T. PAETH and MARGARET C. PAETH v. WORTH TOWNSHIP and BARBARA CUTCHER
GEORGE T. PAETH and MARGARET C. PAETH v. WORTH TOWNSHIP and BARBARA CUTCHER9/2/2010
09-13447: Ericka Savage v. City of Pontiac, Emergency Financial Manager Fred Leeb and Larry Marshall
Ericka Savage v. City of Pontiac, Emergency Financial Manager Fred Leeb and Larry Marshall9/30/2010
09-14171: Jane Price v. Hartford Life And Insurance Company
Jane Price v. Hartford Life And Insurance Company10/12/2010
10-10975: Wendy A. Arrington v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company
Wendy A. Arrington v. Michigan Bell Telephone Company9/29/2010
09-11191: Gillespie v. Commissioner of Social Security
Gillespie v. Commissioner of Social Security10/14/2010
10-11588: Morris v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Joyce M. Sandige
Morris v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and Joyce M. Sandige11/17/2010
10-11989: TIMOTHY KROPF v. TCA, Inc, d/b/a THE COLLECTION AGENCY, and REBECCA PARKS
TIMOTHY KROPF v. TCA, Inc, d/b/a THE COLLECTION AGENCY, and REBECCA PARKS11/23/2010
08-12525: Belfor USA Group, Inc. v. Insurance Reconstruction, LLC and Brad Barrett
Belfor USA Group, Inc. v. Insurance Reconstruction, LLC and Brad Barrett12/10/2010
09-12226: Lee v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund
Lee v. Sheet Metal Workers' National Pension Fund12/20/2010
01-10247-BC: SUPPLEMENT TO OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
SUPPLEMENT TO OPINION AND ORDER CONDITIONALLY GRANTING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS1/29/2009
08-15264: David Maguire and Carole Maguire v. Genesee Couty Sheriff, et .al
David Maguire and Carole Maguire v. Genesee Couty Sheriff, et .al2/17/2009
08-10557: Pucci v. Michigan Supreme Court, et. al.
Pucci v. Michigan Supreme Court, et. al.3/3/2009
07-10631: Pucci v. 19th District Court and Chief Judge Mark W. Somers
Pucci v. 19th District Court and Chief Judge Mark W. Somers3/6/2009
08-12080: OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS AND GRANTING MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE3/27/2009
07-50329: Final Judgment Under Rule 54(b) Denying Comerica Bank's Motion
Final Judgment Under Rule 54(b) Denying Comerica Bank's Motion5/18/2009
07-50329: Opinion on Final Judgment Denying Comerica Bank's Motion to Set Aside Forfeiture
Opinion on Final Judgment Denying Comerica Bank's Motion to Set Aside Forfeiture5/18/2009
07-50329: Opinion and Order Denying Comerica Bank's Motion to Set Aside Forfeiture
Opinion and Order Denying Comerica Bank's Motion to Set Aside Forfeiture5/14/2009
06-14431 (civil) 99-20011 (criminal) : Robinson v. United States of America
Robinson v. United States of America7/14/2009
06-15381 (cv) 99-20011 (cr): Robinson v. United States of America
Robinson v. United States of America7/22/2009
08-14272: ETHEL M. OSLER vs HURON VALLEY AMBULANCE INCORPORATED
ETHEL M. OSLER vs HURON VALLEY AMBULANCE INCORPORATED12/3/2009
02-10277: Barbrasue Beattie, et. al. v. Centurytel, Incorporated
Barbrasue Beattie, et. al. v. Centurytel, Incorporated12/7/2009
08-10570: Norfolk Opinion on Preliminary Injunction
Norfolk Opinion on Preliminary Injunction2/26/2008
06-15024: Proposal 2: Motion Granting Summary Judgment
Proposal 2: Motion Granting Summary Judgment3/18/2008
05-72126: Fharmacy Opinion on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment
Fharmacy Opinion on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment4/3/2008
07-10742: Bobbitt Opinion and Order Granting Class Cert
Bobbitt Opinion and Order Granting Class Cert5/1/2008
06-14888: SPX Order Granting Reconsideration of Claims
SPX Order Granting Reconsideration of Claims5/20/2008
07-10919: Thompson Bey Order Adopting R&R and Denying Dismissal
Thompson Bey Order Adopting R&R and Denying Dismissal5/27/2008
07-11707: Denying Reconsideration of Order Disqualifying Counsel
Denying Reconsideration of Order Disqualifying Counsel7/14/2008
07-10773: Ellis Order Adopt in part R&R, Deny Motion to Dismiss
Ellis Order Adopt in part R&R, Deny Motion to Dismiss7/14/2008
05-10036: Parks Opinion Adopting and Rejecting HC R&R
Parks Opinion Adopting and Rejecting HC R&R7/31/2008
06-14888: SPX Order Overruling Obj to Sanction Order
SPX Order Overruling Obj to Sanction Order8/4/2008
99-10274: Opinion Denying Absolute Writ (Scott v. Bock)
Opinion Denying Absolute Writ (Scott v. Bock)9/18/2008
08-11704: New Vision Opinion Granting Motion to Dismiss
New Vision Opinion Granting Motion to Dismiss10/2/2008
05-10152: Anglers or the Au Sable, et. al. v. United States Forest Service, et. al
Anglers or the Au Sable, et. al. v. United States Forest Service, et. al12/8/2008
07-14036: James Perry and Dominque Yarbro v. City of Pontiac, et. al.
James Perry and Dominque Yarbro v. City of Pontiac, et. al.12/8/2008
08-13066: Sidney High, personal representative of the Estate of Vunies B. High, deceased v. Capital Senior Living Properties 2 - Heatherwood, Inc.,
Sidney High, personal representative of the Estate of Vunies B. High, deceased v. Capital Senior Living Properties 2 - Heatherwood, Inc.,12/17/2008
06-15024: Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, et. al. v. The Regents of the University of Michigan, et. al.
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, et. al. v. The Regents of the University of Michigan, et. al.12/11/2008
06-cv-15024: Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, et al., v. Jennifer Granholm, et al.
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, et al., v. Jennifer Granholm, et al.1/5/2007
05-40277: CHESTERFIELD MARKET, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
CHESTERFIELD MARKET, INC. v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA1/8/2007
05-60293: LAITH HIRMUZ, LUAI HIRMUZ, et al. v CITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS et al.
LAITH HIRMUZ, LUAI HIRMUZ, et al. v CITY OF MADISON HEIGHTS et al.1/3/2007
06-13641: KAY ANGELA HANIF et. al. v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
KAY ANGELA HANIF et. al. v. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY1/16/2007
06-13221: WILLIAM E. BENNETT v. AMERICA ONLINE, INC. et. al.
WILLIAM E. BENNETT v. AMERICA ONLINE, INC. et. al.1/23/2007
99-cv-10176: Julie Olden, et al., v. Lafarge Corporation
Julie Olden, et al., v. Lafarge Corporation1/29/2007
04-10312: RAY BORDEAU v. SAGINAW CONTROL & ENGINEERING, INC.
RAY BORDEAU v. SAGINAW CONTROL & ENGINEERING, INC.2/2/2007
06-13792: NARTRON CORPORATION v. QUANTUM RESEARCH GROUP, LTD.
NARTRON CORPORATION v. QUANTUM RESEARCH GROUP, LTD.2/12/2007
03-cv-10312: AMOS BEECHY et. al. v. CENTRAL MICHIGAN DISTRICT et. al.
AMOS BEECHY et. al. v. CENTRAL MICHIGAN DISTRICT et. al.2/23/2007
06-cv-15021: ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN, INC. v. CITY OF DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS et. al.
ALLIANCE FOR CHILDREN, INC. v. CITY OF DETROIT PUBLIC SCHOOLS et. al.2/23/2007
04-74514: LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND et al. v. INTERIOR EXTERIOR SPECIALISTS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. et al
LABORERS PENSION TRUST FUND et al. v. INTERIOR EXTERIOR SPECIALISTS CONSTRUCTION GROUP, INC. et al3/26/2007
05-73669: WILLIAM KUCHARSKI, SR. et al. v. TODD LEVEILLE et al.
WILLIAM KUCHARSKI, SR. et al. v. TODD LEVEILLE et al.3/26/2007
05-10235: SUSAN T. FIGGINS v. ADVANCE AMERICA CASH ADVANCE CENTERS OF MICHIGAN, INC et. al.
SUSAN T. FIGGINS v. ADVANCE AMERICA CASH ADVANCE CENTERS OF MICHIGAN, INC et. al.3/27/2007
05-73793: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. CURRENCY $11,331
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA V. CURRENCY $11,3313/27/2007
05-10245: OLLIE HERRIN et. al. v. TROOPER ROBERT DUNHAM et. al.
OLLIE HERRIN et. al. v. TROOPER ROBERT DUNHAM et. al.4/6/2007
04-20027: BRIAN MAURICE PATTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
BRIAN MAURICE PATTON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA6/20/2007
04-20014: REGINALD STEVENSON, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
REGINALD STEVENSON, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,7/23/2007
04-cv-71885: Victor T. Weber v. Thomas Van Fossen, et al
Victor T. Weber v. Thomas Van Fossen, et al7/19/2007
05-cv-10323: James Abner, III, et al, v. County of Saginaw County, et al
James Abner, III, et al, v. County of Saginaw County, et al7/19/2007
06-cv-10353: Comerica Inc., v. Zurich American Insurance Co., et al
Comerica Inc., v. Zurich American Insurance Co., et al7/27/2007
05-10200: KATIE ANNE PLATTE et. al. v. THOMAS TOWNSHIP et. al.
KATIE ANNE PLATTE et. al. v. THOMAS TOWNSHIP et. al.9/27/2007
07-12484 : SANDRA C. PEPPERS vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
SANDRA C. PEPPERS vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA11/29/2007
05-73669: Kucharski Opinion Granting Reconsideration
Kucharski Opinion Granting Reconsideration12/7/2007
07-12254: Chesterfield Opinion Striking Jury Demand
Chesterfield Opinion Striking Jury Demand12/20/2007
03-10259: Thoroughbred Opinion Denying Motion for Attorney's Fees
Thoroughbred Opinion Denying Motion for Attorney's Fees12/20/2007
04-10042-BC: FRANK LONG v. DR. MARK ADAMS and SAGINAW VALLEY NEUROSURGERY, P.C.
FRANK LONG v. DR. MARK ADAMS and SAGINAW VALLEY NEUROSURGERY, P.C.1/23/2006
05-10307-BC: DARRELL COWEN and TERESSA COWEN v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC.
DARRELL COWEN and TERESSA COWEN v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS INC.1/31/2006
05-10204-BC: INTERMODAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. NORMAN Y. MINETA, et al.
INTERMODAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. v. NORMAN Y. MINETA, et al.2/7/2006
04-10120-BC: ERIC CARLYLE DEAN et al v. CITY OF BAY CITY, ROBERT V. BELLEMAN et al
ERIC CARLYLE DEAN et al v. CITY OF BAY CITY, ROBERT V. BELLEMAN et al2/16/2006
04-10075: ROBERT SHIMKUS et al. v. THOMAS HICKNER et al
ROBERT SHIMKUS et al. v. THOMAS HICKNER et al2/28/2006
02-10277-BC: BARBRASUE BEATTIE et al v. CENTURYTEL, INCORPORATED
BARBRASUE BEATTIE et al v. CENTURYTEL, INCORPORATED3/10/2006
03-CV-10083-BC: RICHARD DRESSER et al v. CRADLE OF HOPE ADOPTION CENTER,
RICHARD DRESSER et al v. CRADLE OF HOPE ADOPTION CENTER,3/23/2006
05-10089-BC: JEANETTE BEEKER et al. v. HENRY LEWIS et al.
JEANETTE BEEKER et al. v. HENRY LEWIS et al.2/13/2006
03-10011-BC: DIAMOND COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. v. SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,
DIAMOND COMPUTER SYSTEMS, INC. v. SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.,3/27/2006
04-10355-BC: DENISE HUGHES et al. v. REGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING et al.
DENISE HUGHES et al. v. REGION VII AREA AGENCY ON AGING et al.3/28/2006
02-20016: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES HOWARD LAUGHTON
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. JAMES HOWARD LAUGHTON6/26/2006
05-10137-BC: STEVE MONTLE v. WESTWOOD HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et. al.
STEVE MONTLE v. WESTWOOD HEIGHTS SCHOOL DISTRICT et. al.6/15/2006
03-cv-10122: Wesley Seal v. John Alden Life Insurance Company
Wesley Seal v. John Alden Life Insurance Company7/13/2006
04-cr-20026: United States of America v. Timothy E. Wirth
United States of America v. Timothy E. Wirth7/13/2006
03-10259: THOROUGHBRED SOFTWARE v. DICE CORPORATION, CLIFFORD et al.
THOROUGHBRED SOFTWARE v. DICE CORPORATION, CLIFFORD et al.7/21/2006
05-10265: KAREN ANDERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,
KAREN ANDERSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,7/27/2006
05-20043: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KEITH E. KALLSTROM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. KEITH E. KALLSTROM8/30/2006
04-10312: RAY BORDEAU v. SAGINAW CONTROL & ENGINEERING, INC.
RAY BORDEAU v. SAGINAW CONTROL & ENGINEERING, INC.8/24/2006
04-10013: ROBERT G. DUNN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al.
ROBERT G. DUNN v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE et al.8/22/2006
06-12425: RONALD HACKER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al.
RONALD HACKER v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al.9/1/2006
04-10143: JOEL CURRY, et al. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF et al.
JOEL CURRY, et al. v. SCHOOL DISTRICT OF THE CITY OF et al.9/18/2006
05-1032: TRUSTEES OF THE FLINT AREA SHEET et al. v. C3 MECHANICAL, INC.
TRUSTEES OF THE FLINT AREA SHEET et al. v. C3 MECHANICAL, INC.9/26/2006
05-10096: LISA O’CONNOR v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT COMPANY
LISA O’CONNOR v. PROVIDENT LIFE AND ACCIDENT COMPANY9/25/2006
05-10322: JACKIE WARREN DEMIJOHN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
JACKIE WARREN DEMIJOHN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY10/23/2006
04-cv-20038: United States of America v. David Warren Tice, Jr.
United States of America v. David Warren Tice, Jr.10/30/2006
02-10149: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARION L. KINCAID TRUST et. al.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARION L. KINCAID TRUST et. al.11/3/2006
06-13166: SALOM ENTERPRISES, LLC. v. TS TRIM INDUSTRIES, INC.
SALOM ENTERPRISES, LLC. v. TS TRIM INDUSTRIES, INC.11/27/2006
04-cv-10148: Donna UHL, et al., v. Pacific Employer's Insurance Company
Donna UHL, et al., v. Pacific Employer's Insurance Company12/8/2006
06-cv-15024: COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION et. al. v. JENNIFER GRANHOLM et. al.
COALITION TO DEFEND AFFIRMATIVE ACTION et. al. v. JENNIFER GRANHOLM et. al.12/19/2006
01-cv-10337: Linda Rose, et al., v. Saginaw County, et al.
Linda Rose, et al., v. Saginaw County, et al.11/21/2005
05-cv-10009: General Motors Corporation, et al., v. Hirschfield Steel Service Center, Inc., et al.
General Motors Corporation, et al., v. Hirschfield Steel Service Center, Inc., et al.11/8/2005
02-cv-10319: Stephen Zervan v. Maday Construction, Incorporated, et al.
Stephen Zervan v. Maday Construction, Incorporated, et al.10/31/2005
05-cv-10100: Concerned Citizens of Caro v. Michigan Ethanol, L.L.C., et al
Concerned Citizens of Caro v. Michigan Ethanol, L.L.C., et al10/26/2005
04-cv-10292: Linda M. Portwood v. Commissioner of Social Security
Linda M. Portwood v. Commissioner of Social Security10/13/2005
04-cv-10364: Tracy L. Clark v. Aetna Life Insurance Company
Tracy L. Clark v. Aetna Life Insurance Company9/26/2005
99-cv-10090: Michael Ford v. Resident Unit Manager Rodda, et al.
Michael Ford v. Resident Unit Manager Rodda, et al.9/26/2005
03-cv-10115: Wayne Morris Wallace v. Thomas K. Bell
Wayne Morris Wallace v. Thomas K. Bell8/31/2005
05-cv-20008: United States of America v. William Edwin Popham, et al.
United States of America v. William Edwin Popham, et al.8/15/2005
03-cv-20025: United States of America v. Kenneth Kenny
United States of America v. Kenneth Kenny7/8/2005
04-cv-10195: Ronald Schroeder v. City of Vassar, et al.
Ronald Schroeder v. City of Vassar, et al.5/25/2005
05-cv-10084: J. Lewis Cooper Company, et al. v. Diageo North America, et al.
J. Lewis Cooper Company, et al. v. Diageo North America, et al.5/20/2005
04-cv-10066: Kenneth Krupa v. Commissioner of Social Security
Kenneth Krupa v. Commissioner of Social Security4/19/2005
05-cv-10008: Westfield Insurance Corporation v. Mainstream Capital Corporation
Westfield Insurance Corporation v. Mainstream Capital Corporation4/19/2005
03-cv-10234: Norman H. Redfield v. Commissioner of Social Security
Norman H. Redfield v. Commissioner of Social Security4/5/2005
04-cv-10281: Frederick Allen Kennedy v. R.W.C., Inc. et al.
Frederick Allen Kennedy v. R.W.C., Inc. et al.3/16/2005
02-cv-10169: Peter D. Yuch v. Commissioner of Social Security
Peter D. Yuch v. Commissioner of Social Security3/16/2005
02-cv-10161: David H. McLean v. Commissioner of Social Security
David H. McLean v. Commissioner of Social Security3/16/2005
02-cv-10292: Wayne Edward Houck v. Commissioner of Social Security
Wayne Edward Houck v. Commissioner of Social Security2/9/2005
03-cv-10083: Dresser et. al. v. Cradle of Hope Adoption Center, et. al
Dresser et. al. v. Cradle of Hope Adoption Center, et. al2/9/2005
04-cv-10102: Detmar Finke v. Kirtland Community College Board of Trustees, et al.
Detmar Finke v. Kirtland Community College Board of Trustees, et al.2/9/2005
01-cv-10337: Linda Rose, et al., v. Saginaw County, et al.
Linda Rose, et al., v. Saginaw County, et al.1/25/2005
03-cv-20064: United States of America v. Santana Romero Dottery
United States of America v. Santana Romero Dottery1/24/2005
04-cv-10206: James Wineman, et al. v. Durkee Lakes Hunting & Fishing Club, Incorporated
James Wineman, et al. v. Durkee Lakes Hunting & Fishing Club, Incorporated1/13/2005
99-cv-20060: United States of America v. Michael J. Kuhn
United States of America v. Michael J. Kuhn1/12/2005
01-cv-10354: Karen Stead v. Commissioner of Social Security
Karen Stead v. Commissioner of Social Security1/10/2005
02-CV-10318: Choice L. Causey and Henretta Denise Bradley v. City of Bay City, et al.
Choice L. Causey and Henretta Denise Bradley v. City of Bay City, et al.1/6/2005
04-cv-10051: Eric E. Brege v. Lakes Shipping Company, Incorporated, et al.
Eric E. Brege v. Lakes Shipping Company, Incorporated, et al.12/29/2004
02-cv-10087: Clarence Young v. Commisioner of Social Security
Clarence Young v. Commisioner of Social Security12/22/2004
03-cv-10226: Justin Jamison v. Dow Chemical Company
Justin Jamison v. Dow Chemical Company12/20/2004
02-cv-10285: Theresa Brandt, et al. v. Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc., et al.
Theresa Brandt, et al. v. Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc., et al.12/14/2004
04-cv-10098: Frank Van Wulfen v. Montmorency County, et al.
Frank Van Wulfen v. Montmorency County, et al.11/10/2004
01-cv-10312: Alexander N. Smith, by his parents Kenneth W. Smith and Janet S. Smith v. Mount Pleasant Public Schools
Alexander N. Smith, by his parents Kenneth W. Smith and Janet S. Smith v. Mount Pleasant Public Schools12/23/2003
00-cv-10485: Gary Majeske v. Bay City Board of Education
Gary Majeske v. Bay City Board of Education12/27/2001