Criminal Practice and Trial Procedure
A. ATTORNEY CONFERENCE AND DISCLOSURE
Within ten (10) days of the date of arraignment, government and defense counsel shall meet and confer for the purpose of resolving or minimizing the issues in controversy.
Upon the request of defense counsel, government counsel shall:
(A) provide defense counsel with the information described in Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 16(a)(1); and
(B) permit defense counsel to inspect and copy or photograph any exculpatory/impeachment evidence within the meaning of Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), United States v. Agurs, 427 U.S. 97 (1976), and Giglio v. United States, 405 U.S. 150 (1972).
A list of such evidence shall be prepared and signed by all counsel. Copies of the items which have been disclosed shall be initialed or otherwise marked.
B. DISCLOSURE DECLINED
If, in the judgment of government counsel, it would be detrimental to the government's interests to make any of the disclosures set forth in the paragraph above, the government shall file a motion within the ten-day period seeking relief from this Order and setting forth the specific reasons therefore.
C. CONTINUING DUTY
The duty to disclose is continuing, even throughout trial.
D. DISCOVERY BY THE GOVERNMENT
Nothing in these procedures is designed to preclude discovery by the government under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, nor to alter the Defendant's obligation, if any, under Rule 16(b).
E. PRE-TRIAL MOTIONS
Before any pre-trial motion is filed, compliance with Local Criminal Rule 12.1 must be observed.
G. WITNESS LIST
By the deadline established in the Scheduling Order, and to enable the Court to better estimate the length of trial, each party shall submit directly to Judge Berg's chambers a list of witnesses by name and agency (if appropriate), whom it reasonably anticipates it will call to testify at trial, noting the approximate amount of time the party anticipates will be needed for examination of each such witness. The list must be served on opposing counsel; proof of service must be attached. This list and proof of service are NOT to be electronically filed or otherwise submitted to the Clerk's Office.
H. EARLY DISCLOSURE OF JENCKS MATERIAL
The court urges the government to disclose Jencks materials well in advance of the trial, and in the event that some of the information is not disclosed pursuant to the Act until the witness testifies, the court allows a reasonable amount of additional time during trial for the defense to prepare before proceeding.
I. JURY INSTRUCTIONS
The parties must meet and confer prior to trial to discuss jury instructions. By the deadline established in the Scheduling Order, the parties must submit directly to Judge Berg's chambers a single set of proposed, stipulated jury instructions. Counsel are responsible for submitting all instructions related to their specific claims or defenses, and special instructions relating to evidence.
All such instructions are to be submitted in typewritten form (double spaced) and on computer disk compatible with Microsoft Word or WordPerfect version 12.0; each instruction shall contain references to authority (e.g., "Devitt and Blackmar, Section 11.08"), and each instruction shall be on a separate page. In addition, each party must submit separately to Judge Berg's chambers all additional proposed instruction (in the same form) to which any other party objects. The parties must make a concerted, good faith effort to narrow the areas of dispute and to discuss each instruction with a view to reaching agreement as to an acceptable form. Disputes between the government and defense counsel regarding proposed jury instructions are initially settled at a hearing on the record.
The court has its own standard introductory and concluding instructions, and counsel are directed to concentrate on elements of the offense, the defense(s), etc. In criminal cases, the Court will usually instruct the jury using the Sixth Circuit's pattern jury instructions when available. The jury is charged before final argument
J. JURY SELECTION
The Court uses a "struck jury" system for jury selection. In most cases, the government is allowed 6 peremptory challenges and the defendant is allowed 10 peremptory challenges. The Court will select twelve regular and two alternate jurors. Alternate jurors are not told they are alternates; they are dismissed by random draw at the conclusion of the proofs.
Voir dire will be conducted by the court. Counsel should submit proposed voir dire questions in writing at least three days in advance, and will be permitted to submit additional questions to be asked by the court, as provided by Fed. R. Crim. P. 24(a).
K. NOTE TAKING & JUROR INVOLVEMENT
Jurors will be permitted to take notes during trial. The Court specifically instructs the jury in advance on this issue. Jurors who choose to take notes will be instructed that such notes are not themselves evidence, but are merely aids to the juror's memory of the evidence presented at trial. The Court will consider, on a case by case basis, whether or not jurors will be permitted to question witnesses, either directly or through submission of questions to be asked by the Court.
L. MULTI-DEFENDANT OR MEGA TRIALS
The Court does not have a general procedure for handling multi-defendant criminal "mega trials." For multi-defendant criminal trials the court encourages attorneys to work out procedure for peremptory challenges among themselves. In such trials, if counsel cannot agree among themselves, the court will allocate peremptory challenges depending on the circumstances of the case.
Continuances of trial dates or continuances during trial will not be granted because of unavailability of witnesses. Please notify the Court if Court intervention is necessary to secure witness attendance. Otherwise, witnesses will be expected to be available when called.
N. TRIAL BRIEFS ENCOURAGED
The Court encourages, but does not require, the submission of a criminal trial brief. If a trial brief is submitted, it should, among other things, inform the court about the party's proposed resolution of anticipated evidence problems.
In any criminal case assigned to Judge Berg, the government shall immediately determine whether any portion of the case or its previous investigation was opened in the United States Attorney's office for the Eastern District of Michigan during the time frame August 15, 2008 until January 4, 2010, and if it was, shall immediately inform the Court and defense counsel of that fact.
Upon its own initiative or by motion of any party, the Court may recuse itself from any matter over which Judge Berg may have presided as interim United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, or any matter in which he represented the United States as an Assistant U.S. Attorney.