Case Management and Scheduling Orders |
A. CIVIL CASES
Two to four weeks after the Answer is filed, the Court will issue its Notice of Scheduling and Case Management Conference. If there is more than one named Defendant, the court typically schedules the conference after all the Defendants have filed Answers, unless doing so will cause significant delay.
The parties are required to submit a Rule 26(f) plan and/or a Case Summary as described in the Notice no later than one business day prior to the initial scheduling conference. Parties should strive to make the plan truly “joint” and make every effort to resolve disputes before the call. If there are points of disagreement remaining in the Rule 26(f) Plan, parties should clearly indicate that in the submission and be prepared to resolve them on the conference.
If a dispositive motion is filed in lieu of an Answer, the Court generally will hold the initial scheduling conference after the motion is ruled upon. This may occur the same day as the motion hearing if the Court rules from the bench.
At the initial scheduling conference, the Court expects the parties to be prepared to discuss the case and the issues, the Court's subject matter jurisdiction, the parties' interest in state court evaluation and/or facilitation, and any other standard procedural/scheduling issues such as case management dates. The Court expects counsel to discuss alternative dispute resolution (ADR) options with their clients prior to the initial scheduling conference.
B. CRIMINAL CASES
Upon its own initiative or by motion of any party, the Court shall recuse itself from any matter over which Judge Berg presided as interim United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, or in which he represented the United States as an Assistant United States Attorney.